Posted by so on May 18, 2005, at 3:28:08
In reply to Re: failed to be unblocked, posted by Dr. Bob on May 18, 2005, at 1:37:33
I wonder about the title you gave to your post -"Failed to be unblocked". The action in question was to unblock, the failure to which you seem to refer was a failure to perform the action. You are the agent of action in this context, but you seem to infer that it was a failure on my part that led to your inaction. In no way did I "fail" so as to cause myself not to be unblocked for reasons not otherwise stated here in this forum. Just to be clear, I am writing about your actions, not about mine. If you would like to discuss a particular action of mine, please state to which action you refer.
>
> Sorry, I can get behind. Could you send it to me again? I left that name blocked for another reason.A reason you declined to disclose here on the forum? Perhaps if you would disclose, in the context of a particular post, the reasons you blocked a particular user name and the duration for which you intend to block that username, I will not need to repeatedly clamor for a reply to my e-mails.
> > The experience also damaged any likelihood that I would seek professional care for a mental health problem or for any other health concern.
>
> Don't assume all professionals are like me!
>
> BobMy well-informed perception is that your rhetorical style is very similar to that of other top-level health-care professionals.
Since a posture of complete trustworthiness is a standard part of the healthcare-giver presentation, it would be difficult if not impossible to select trustworthy professionals from a group among which one suspects a majority might not be deserving of trust. Each experience with a professional whose rhetoric does not comport with their behavior or with science further degrades the likelihood I will seek care for a readily treatable but life-threatening ailment I suffer.
poster:so
thread:499301
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20050517/msgs/499335.html