Posted by Lou Pilder on March 12, 2005, at 14:38:10
In reply to Lou's request to Dr. Hsiung-Crst,Gd,suprm?, posted by Lou Pilder on March 12, 2005, at 10:10:36
> Dr. Hsiung,
> I am requesting that you write a determination as to if the following is acceptable or not in relation to the guidlines of the faith forum.
> The poster writes,[...Christ, God, since he is supreme...]
> and,
> [...I must compromise with him...].
> Lou Pilder
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faith/20050111/msgs/469883.html
Dr. Hsiung,
In a reply from you to me could you consider the following?
In the above, the poster writes,[..Christ,God,since he is supreme...].
Let us look at the gramamtical construction. Since "God" is set off by commas, could not the statement have the potential to mean that it is Christ that is "supreme"? If so, could that not have the potential to arrouse antisemitic feelings or to have the potential to put down jews and those that do not consider Christ to be supreme?
Lou Pilder
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:470029
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20050219/msgs/470086.html