Posted by Lou Pilder on January 21, 2005, at 15:06:42
In reply to Re: list of criteria » Dr. Bob, posted by malthus on January 21, 2005, at 6:12:03
There is a suggestion that one post directly to the poster vs posting to a third party,(directly to you)is not supportive.
Well, I tried that and there is a large body of objections to me requesting clarification about what someone wrote either to me or about something relevant to me in the archives. I do agree that to post directly has its merits, but I also think that there is the potential for conflict because of the potential for there to be confrontation.
OTOH, posting to the admin. board has also posts objecting to that in the archives.
I propose the following:
That there be appointed 12 spacific deputys in charge of objections to posts by other posters. The deputys will have 1 hour to respond to an email to the objection or request for a determination. Each deputy could have their own specialty and be on call durring their 2 hour convieniant times to answer objections to posts.
They will reply accordingly and there could be an appeal to Dr. Hsiung. I can think of many posters here that have particular expertise in distinct areas to handle calls for objections by other posters. I think that this has the potential to prevent confrontation and at the same time avoid the admin. board to have it there. Am I on the right track?
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:444641
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20050116/msgs/445292.html