Posted by alexandra_k on December 8, 2004, at 0:48:02
In reply to Re: Scapegoating in groups, posted by Dr. Bob on December 8, 2004, at 0:11:49
I am confused as to why someone would say what was said in the passage. It seems to be saying that conflict arises because of there being a member leader boundary. Then that conflict is deflected to other members of the group. Then you try to interveane by allowing (I prefer encouraging myself) people to have conflict with you so they stoppit with the other members of the group. But then the passage seemed to be saying that the conflict was there in the first place because of the leader member boundary. Maybe I am reading it all wrong...
I guess conflict arises for other reasons as well?
Is this why you are getting more democratic?
poster:alexandra_k
thread:425655
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20041109/msgs/425994.html