Posted by Lou Pilder on November 5, 2004, at 10:05:16
In reply to Re: Lou offers some clarification » Lou Pilder, posted by NikkiT2 on November 5, 2004, at 9:27:00
NikkiT2,
You wrote about Dr. Hsiung {not} giving you a PBC for posts in question. You wrote then that {thus} he finds it obviously finds it acceptable.
I am of the school of logic that says that just because someone does not give a determination per a request from someone, that the absence of a determination does not necessarrily mean that what was in question {is} acceptable. My request is to Dr. Hsiung for the determinationan and the school of logic that I know of does not mean that something is acceptable to the one being asked for the determination about, because someone else thinks that it is acceptable. I am awaiting a determination from Dr. Hsiung comcerning if his reply to my request for a clarification to his reply to me means that your posts are either acceptable or not here in relation to the guidlines of the forum. It is important that I know what Dr. Hsiung's determination will be in his reply to my reply to his reply to me concerniing this. If he does reply that the post(s) in question are acceptable, then we could go from there. But at this juncture, I have not seen a post from Dr. Hsiung that writes as to if those posts in question are acceptable or not. The argument that they are because he has not given you a PBC I do not accept because in the thread where the poster wrote about the poem on the faith board, I had asked Dr. Hsiung for a determination and he gave me a determination on something that I did not ask for a determination about. When I clarified to him that my request was not answered because that was not what I had asked him, he then reversed his determination and wrote that the post was not acceptable. In my request concerning Dr. Hsiung's own statement that I felt put down christians, he later wrote that I had a valid objection to his post about what Jean Jacques Rousseau wrote and modified the faith board in relation to such. I believe that there could be many reasons why a post is left without a PBC and that the absence of one does not ligitimise it even though some could think that and that is why I am requesting that the posts be determied one way or the other so that people could know if the pposts in question are acceptable or not.. But if Dr. Hsiung does spacifically state that what you wrote is acceptable here, then that would be definitive.
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:412031
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20041027/msgs/412070.html