Posted by Lou Pilder on October 22, 2004, at 11:46:04
In reply to Lou's request to Dr.Hsiung, posted by Lou Pilder on October 22, 2004, at 10:57:16
Dr. Hsiung,
Another aspect of the post on question is that the poster writes, [...I looked back through the archives and noticed that {the [same] (accuser)}...].
It is my opinion that the gramatical structure of that statement has the potential for others to think that to be referring to someone here and that the posts that the poster referrs to as,[...that serve no other purpose than to provoke others...] could be also on the board now. I think that there is this possibility because of the gramatical structure , [...{same} accuser...] as to have the potential for others to think that there is this unnamed poster here that is the poster of posts in the archives and posts visible on the board now that, as the poster writes, [...serve no other purpose than to provoke others...]..
I am requesting that you make a determination as to if the poster is, or is not, accusing someone here now of being an accuser,and, if your determination is that the poster is accusing someone here now of being an accuser, if it is acceptable to do so, in relation to the guidlines of the forum, because the poster does not write the name of the poster who is [...the same accuser...].
Lou Pilder
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20041012/msgs/405812.html
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:405855
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20041012/msgs/405884.html