Re: A physician's moral indifference to peer opinions

Posted by Toph on October 13, 2004, at 15:36:00

In reply to A physician's moral indifference to peer opinions, posted by Mary_Bowers on October 13, 2004, at 14:23:22

1987? Hmmm.
My thought is, the State probably reviewed the first guy who experimented with giving salt to manic-depressives. Years later hundreds of thousands of us are glad someone discovered the benefits of lithium.
Is is condescending to suggest that people who participate in PB of there own free will need the protections of the State?

Thread

A physician's moral indifference to peer opinions Mary_Bowers 10/13/04
I have not seen your name here before » Mary_Bowers partlycloudy 10/13/04
Re: Holding a Grudge against Dr. Bob. » Mary_Bowers jay 10/13/04
Re: A physician's moral indifference to peer opinions Toph 10/13/04
Re: No problems here » Mary_Bowers AuntieMel 10/13/04
Jeepers » Mary_Bowers pegasus 10/13/04
I disagree very strongly » Mary_Bowers Racer 10/13/04
Re: please be civil » Mary_Bowers Dr. Bob 10/13/04
Thank you, Dr. Bob Simus 10/13/04
mary... justyourlaugh 10/13/04
Re: A physician's moral indifference to peer opini Cass 10/13/04
Cass excellent response.... Jai Narayan 10/13/04
Re: Cass excellent response.... » Jai Narayan partlycloudy 10/13/04
Do we have a lawyer in the house? Jai Narayan 10/13/04
Re: A physician's moral indifference to peer opinions coral 10/13/04
Not to be nit-picky, but....dang it, I'm a moth! gardenergirl 10/13/04
...
Re: please be civil » pafaye Dr. Bob 11/13/04

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:Toph thread:402705
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20041012/msgs/402727.html

	for
in