Posted by Lou Pilder on September 29, 2004, at 0:09:20
In reply to Re: To Dr. Hsiung,, posted by SLS on September 28, 2004, at 23:38:37
Dr. Hsiung,
In this thread Scott has posted in this discussion as a contributor. That is the type of post that I consider to be one to start the consecutive posts over.
I would like for you to understand my point to Rosie. I know that me and you have been adversaries in certian issues. But this time, I would like for us to be in accord.
When I wrote that it would be easy for me and Rosie or any one else to have some type of affiliate to circumvent the rule, I meant that posters could have some sort of system to be affiliated with each other some way in order to post to start any consecutive posts over, thearby circumventing the rule. An affiliat, or in this case, some type of affiliate, means that two people get together in some way. They are affiliated with each other. I did not want it to look like me and Rosie were in affiliation for the purpose of circumventing the rule. It could look like that and I belive that Scott sees that also. One could email the other to do it.
I am sorry thast Rosie took this differently than I had intended and wish you all that you find in this forum the support that you are looking for. As for me, I feel that if rules are made that restrict me from posting, then I can not be the contributor that I want to be.
Best wishes,
Lou Pilder
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:396564
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20040927/msgs/396659.html