Posted by Mitchell on January 20, 2003, at 14:37:58
In reply to Re: I still don't get it » Mitchell, posted by Dinah on January 20, 2003, at 9:30:47
> Is there more going on here than meets the eye, Mitchell?
The study of human cognition reveals that not all of what meets the eye is processed and perceived by the conscious mind.
> It isn't an unreasonable decision.
Scientific reasoning is a process. A person's individual reasons do not comprise sufficient rational to conclude something is reasonable by scientific standards. Merely considering alternatives does not comprise scientific reasoning. Methodically weighing alternatives comprises the work of science.
> Is your problem with his research or his articles or his science? If I understood your objections to be with his publishing or research I think I could understand better.
My observation is that Hsuing published research conclusions profering his site at the best of both worlds before doing the scientific work needed to qualitatively measure the worlds he purports to have bettered. People routinely feel put down by his administrative style. The style he has chosen is based in his personal preferences, and perhaps styled to fit his capacity to manage the board. His preference for public admonishments and for policies that benefit what he describes as a group at the expense of individual members are not research based. Unfortunately, the product of his uncontrolled research (research with no control group) may set precedent for similar projects.
poster:Mitchell
thread:8860
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20021128/msgs/8904.html