Re: Dang it, Phil's blocked again.

Posted by oracle on October 29, 2002, at 2:10:56

In reply to Re: Dang it, Phil's blocked again., posted by Tabßitha on October 29, 2002, at 1:58:49

I think he was OK up to "Nazi". That one put
him over the top.
I think Lou is blocked, too:
<quote>
> It is my understanding that the following statement would be restrained here:
> [The Rider said to me "I am your God amd (sic) you XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX."]
Yes, so posting it again will mean being blocked again.
<end quote>

Thread

Phil on Faith: song about Lou wendy b. 10/28/02
It does seem to defy logic (nm) » wendy b. mair 10/28/02
Re: Dang it, Phil's blocked again. Tabßitha 10/29/02
Re: Dang it, Phil's blocked again. oracle 10/29/02
Re: Dang it, Phil's blocked again. » oracle Tabßitha 10/29/02
Re: Dang it, Phil's blocked again. tina 10/29/02
I agree. » oracle BeardedLady 10/29/02
Re: Dang it, Phil's blocked again. Dinah 10/29/02
I wouldn't mind it if it were done with affection. » Dinah BeardedLady 10/29/02
Re: I wouldn't mind it if it were done with affection. Dinah 10/29/02
Re: I wouldn't mind it if it were done with affection. » BeardedLady Dinah 10/29/02
roast posts » Dinah BeardedLady 10/29/02
well.... SandraDee 10/29/02
Re: roast posts mair 10/29/02
Re: I wouldn't mind it if it were done with affection. » Dinah ShelliR 11/21/02
The nazi quoting Jesus? Lou wrote it. Phil 11/21/02

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:oracle thread:7955
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20020918/msgs/7976.html

	for
in