Posted by Krazy Kat on May 9, 2002, at 19:56:50
In reply to Re: phil, i'm glad you understand my intentions... » Krazy Kat, posted by Ron Hill on May 9, 2002, at 17:50:56
a series of posts from the last month or so.
phil's comment that my post was "childish", or such, was extremely hurtful, as was his comment re: sar. how can one not take those personally as well? why didn't he ask me if my intention was what he thought it was instead of jumping to conclusions? why am i saying i'm sorry, and phil's not?
why am i supposed to take phil's anger, directed AT ME, when that's supposed to be a "no, no"?
I don't know what else to do...
- kk
poster:Krazy Kat
thread:4997
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20020420/msgs/5036.html