Posted by Dr. Bob on December 27, 2001, at 5:58:31
In reply to Re: please be civil, posted by stjames on December 27, 2001, at 1:38:51
> May I reply to the post of Annie's where she says that my claims are unscientific, and that I am "spewing unfounded propaganda"? See:
>
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20011213/msgs/87377.htmlOops, sorry, I missed that! Still, you know the preferred types of responses to comments like that, right? :-)
> I guarantee that my reply will conform to the highest levels of civility...
If it's civil, it's up to you, but maybe it would be better just to let it go? Or just to post a link (see below)?
> My real question is, why, Dr Bob, do you allow these disussions of True Hope to continue ? ... How much more does a medical doctor need to call a scam a scam ?I understand what you're saying, and it applies to discussion of illegal drugs as well as of "scams", but I see my role more as maintaining an open forum than as deciding what can and can't be talked about (though there are exceptions).
> One gets tired having to refute this issue again and again.
But wouldn't it be easy just to post a link to a previous refutation?
Bob
poster:Dr. Bob
thread:2529
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20011216/msgs/2532.html