Posted by Dr. Bob on May 28, 2001, at 10:47:53
In reply to Re: Dr. Bob---Dare anyone disagree? , posted by Shar on May 28, 2001, at 0:12:40
> My post was specifically related to a particular type of posting which is "dismissive of the hundreds of people expressing pain on these boards."
Your original post on this thread? I'm not sure what post it was in response to, maybe this one I deleted?
> > Sitting around like this would never cure any disease. You have to actively try and conquer. Even people with no legs are out their in wheelchairs living at least a little.
> To reiterate my point....that type of post is civil? And stating my opinion about the offending post is not? (rhetorical questions)
I think that post would've been OK if it hadn't been directed at someone in particular. And your response was OK, too.
> As I said, "There is something provoking about someone posting on a meds-related board that meds won't solve the problem." It is very close to taking away whatever shreds of hope people may still have, which is, IMHO, cruel...and insensitive, too.
It *is* provoking. OTOH, meds don't solve all problems, and sometimes alternatives besides meds give people hope, too.
> When I stated my opinion about the previously submitted post, I was asked to be civil.
If I have this right, what you said then was:
> > I was wondering if you also felt less self-centered and selfish now.
In that case, I did *not* think you expressed your opinion in a civil way.
--------
> The post I am referring to was less than civil; thoroughly contemptuous in fact. However since it contained no (explicitly) personal attacks or expletives, it was deemed acceptable.
Containing no (explicitly) personal attacks or expletives is a good start, at least. If you want, let me know which post you're referring to, and I'll take another look.
Bob
poster:Dr. Bob
thread:1236
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20010315/msgs/1322.html