Posted by bleauberry on February 3, 2019, at 8:38:20
In reply to Lyme Disease article., posted by SLS on February 2, 2019, at 6:52:21
I would just add that the patients who take it seriously show the greatest improvements, and those who don't, don't.
I would also add to it, that mold toxicity is more common than any of us know, and is really toxic to the brain. And that most of it is coming from our food choices, not from our homes.
And that the actual issues are not determined by the label of "the thing", but rather, the resulting inflammation and toxicity from it. Our enemy is not mold, or lyme, or virus, or gluten, or a dozen other things - our enemy is the body's reaction to those. Which we can objectively measure and treat with both supplements and meds.
I would also add that there is danger in cherry picking literature that fits a preconceived notion. It is better to not cherry pick, to look deeply into what you disagree with, as well as what you do agree with, and everything in between, and form a "big picture" from all of it, that encompasses all of it.
Everything I have said here is really hard for the depressed patient and nobody understands that better than I do.
That's why I insist everyone needs a clinician who has significant extracurricular training and expertise in all of these areas, rather than a specialist who is not much different than cherry picking.
> I found a nice article describing the history behind the discovery and phenomenology of Lyme Disease and other tick-borne illnesses. I think some people exaggerate the incidence of Lyme Disease in psychiatric syndromes. Nevertheless, it is good to know things.
>
>
> - Scott
poster:bleauberry
thread:1103086
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20181024/msgs/1103098.html