Posted by pseudoname on May 18, 2006, at 16:38:00
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica (June 2006); v 113(6): 460+
“Antidepressants: general practitioners' opinions and clinical practice” by S Rambelomanana [et al]Objective: To describe and compare general practitioners' (GPs) opinions on antidepressant drugs and their prescriptions to depressed patients.
Method: Between November 2000 and July 2001 a representative sample of French GPs was asked their opinion of the 15 most prescribed antidepressants, and then to describe the treatments of the current depressive episode of four depressive patients each, their changes and the reasons thereof.
Results: One hundred and eighty-one GPs and 778 patients participated. The best-ranked antidepressants by the GPs were paroxetine, fluoxetine, sertraline and clomipramine for efficacy, and paroxetine, tianeptine, sertraline and fluoxetine for tolerability. In patients, the drugs most often prescribed were fluoxetine, paroxetine, and sertraline. Those least often stopped for intolerance were moclobemide (0%), dosulepine (0%), venlafaxine (4.5%) and citalopram (5.0%), and maprotiline (0%), citalopram (1.7%) and venlafaxine (2.3%) for lack of efficacy. The best predictor for prescription of antidepressants was the GPs' overall ranking, itself depending on opinions of the tolerability and efficacy of the drug. However, the GPs' OPINIONS OF TOLERABILITY AND EFFICACY WERE NOT RELATED TO THE RATES OF TREATMENT DISCONTINUATION FOR INTOLERABILITY OR INEFFICACY.
Conclusion: Prescriber opinion does not seem related to actual product performance.
poster:pseudoname
thread:645580
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20060515/msgs/645580.html