Posted by adamie on August 7, 2001, at 8:45:49
hi. I have read much in this forum how people believe reboxetine which is avialable here in Canada has not been too effective for them. But perhaps Reboxetine is just not effective for cases of difficult to treat depression since that is the majority that is on this board? Perhaps it is actually a very decent med for people with an easier to treat depression (I am hoping that is my case, so far only one failure -paxil)?I am just wondering because if a few future meds wouldn't work then I really think I should try Reboxetine which works only for norepinephrine. My depression is quite moderate now but unstable. I have been crying quite a bit the last few days from 1 week of not crying at all. But probably I wont get significantly worse.
The appeal of reboxetine for me has been that it works for norepinphrine, it's stimulating, and on all the studies it has shown to be more effective than older meds. Perhaps this is because it is a good med for non difficult to treat depression? please reply.
poster:adamie
thread:73915
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20010804/msgs/73915.html