![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 1 to 7 of 7. This is the beginning of the thread.
Posted by alexandra_k on February 12, 2022, at 15:53:29
articulate reasons, weigh them, get at the likely truth, progress things from there, in a timely fashion.
not in the law courts, and not in any other context, either (e.g., not in academia when it comes to writing a thesis).
just exhorbitant amounts of time wasted on peripheral issues or whatever.
i think it does make the most sense to understand it as stabotage. it isn't ineptitude or incompetence there is a willful misunderstanding. that's what's going on.
it happens with stats too.
the idea is that stats or reasoning is a tool. the idea is that you 'can' (in some sense of 'can') argue things both ways, or show (with stats) things to be both ways...
so these things are just a tool. you use them to support whatever it is that you already decided on independent grounds.
(on what kinds of independnet grounds? why your preexisting biases and so on).
__
there is no undresetanding of conducting yourself or your investigation with integrity or honesty to get to a greater truth.
of course they squawk at me that i'm guilty of the one-sided thing (my thesis etc).
they squawk they squawk they squawk..
you know, they are still squawking about how garbage i am.
i applied to be enrolled in a 120 point qualification (1 year full time) and dthey refused to get my work to external examiners becuase they wanted to prevent and prohibit them signing off that i completed the qualification within the 1 year on a full time basis.
that is to say they determined that they would not accept anything from me unless it was late (they decided i must be a 'slow learner / slow worker') else they would not acknowledge any work from me, at all.
they refused to get it to externals to prevent and prohibit them signing me off.
because they'd rather keep me as slave or just have me die already. right? i mean, they would rather i not do anything at all. they would rather i be dead already or if i'm alive i just be meat. right?
that's their vision for development.
becuase its sooooooooo competitive. they are paid to ensure nobody else get anything done.
___
Posted by alexandra_k on February 12, 2022, at 16:01:58
In reply to no willingness / ability to..., posted by alexandra_k on February 12, 2022, at 15:53:29
they are so busy undermining and stabotaging the work of others they don't get anything done themselves.
well, that's not true.
they don't do anything themselves.
they have large teaching workloads...
and by the seems of it they only give good grades, now, to students who report back to the lecturer exactly what the lecturer said to them. that is to say they write up the lecturers lecture or powerpoint into essay format and that is all. they are allowed to summarise only.
then what happens (in a thesis, say) is that the student summarises the lectures that the supervisor gave them (say in an in person meeting) and writes them up and presents them to the supervisor. then the supervisor asks questions about the write-up either in the margins or in person.
then the student writes the questions in as objections. and then responds to the questions or objections with what the supervisor says in response to the questions or objections that they raised.
and in this manner students are... doing the equivalent of writing down the Kripke lectures. that's how the students are allowed to do work. transcribing what the supervisor or the lecturers say.
that's how you write a PhD thesis that your supervisor thinks is good enoguh to be signed off.
thten the work goes to externals. and of course they don't like your superlvisors views they like their own views. so they get you working for them, now. they have questions and they want bits to be delieted.
so now you have crying tantrums because one person wants page 4 to be removed and another person thinks page 4 is the best page of all.
and now you are supposed to...
suck everybodies dick so everybody feels happy.
and how long is this supposedt o take?
well, in Australasia...
who is your daddy?
will sort of determine how long it takes, really. so far as I can see...
what reason they think they have to sign you off...
when they can just keep you around writing up their views....
Makes them feel big, you see.
______________________________________
120 points. 1 year. full time.
_________
nonnononononononono some people slave for 10+ years on their PhD -- right?
it's totally at the discretion of the university.
to keep slaves.
it's totally at the discretion of the university to refuse to sign off on students work because...
because they would rather keep slaves.
right?
i mean...
that's how universities work. right?
that's how we get arts and culture and rockets to the next volcano...
by keeping slaves.
sure.
Posted by alexandra_k on February 12, 2022, at 16:06:26
In reply to Re: no willingness / ability to..., posted by alexandra_k on February 12, 2022, at 16:01:58
the ideal seems to be to shut things down to turn things off.
to make a babel.
to make it so that reason and statistics (even) are not valued at all. they don't function to be tools in the service of knowledge or truth or understanding.
they are tools to be pulled out so that our politicians and leaders can pretend to be credible.
but what they spout is just garbage garbage garbage output.
that's the thing of it.
___
i mean... that's the thing with the statistics. you don't cherry pick what tests you do and just present your side of it.
because your job isn't to swindle.
you do all the different tests and you see what you find. you build up a picture.
people from here don't understand. don't get it.
i guess that is why they are here...
no. that's what the government will have us believe.
there's nothing wrong with most of the people of nz.
the problem is in the leadership. how it won't allow anybody to function.
Posted by alexandra_k on February 12, 2022, at 16:08:51
In reply to Re: no willingness / ability to..., posted by alexandra_k on February 12, 2022, at 16:06:26
won't wear a proper mask?
the director general of health and the minister of health and the prime minister...
won't wear a surgical mask.
won't wear a N-95 mask.
won't wear a P-2 mask.
just won't do it.
I think it has to do with their refusal to supply basic supplies to the hospitals and dto health care workers.
but maybe it is more than that. to do with compliance.
they are really really really holding out on wearing proper masks.
i am not sure why.
i suspect it is likely because they'd rather most of our people die. they don't want them wearing proper masks etc.
Posted by alexandra_k on February 12, 2022, at 16:13:58
In reply to are we the only country where the leaders..., posted by alexandra_k on February 12, 2022, at 16:08:51
i think the leaders are only just starting to come to terms with the fact that people from new zealand...
can read the washington post and the new york times... australian and english etc newspapers.
can read high quality research outputs. nature. and so on.
that the new zealadn government does not have control over keeping the people impoverished with the sh*tty garbage they spout in local media or on social media or the sh*tty garbage they acknowledge as output of the universities.
they don't have control over the reading material and the ideas and the ideals and the ideologies that the people of nz are exposed to.
the people of new zealand know we don't have access to many of the things that people overseas have access to.
the people of new zealand can aquire various things via amazon and the like...
the government is threatening to steal things that people get in... antibody tests andt he like...
but i don't know that that attitude is very sustainable for very long... getting between foreign businesses and new zealand purchasers...
it becomes clearer and clearer and clearer that it is the nz government trying to force people to conditions of deprivation.
ideologically even.
refusing to allow people to work to internatioanlly accepted standards.
they need tobe able to self-publish. for sure.
look at the garbage output that the government will publish, only.
so people can see... it isnt' that the people from nz are retarded. it is that hte leaders are and they refuse to allow the people with the capacity to function to capacity.
the leadership...
i get that it isn't the politicians (they have in fact little to no control over how they are portrayed by the media etc).
the think-tank. the ministry. the high paid senior officials who make stupid f*ck*ng decisions to the detriment of us all.
Posted by alexandra_k on February 12, 2022, at 16:20:04
In reply to social media, posted by alexandra_k on February 12, 2022, at 16:13:58
what's f*ck*ng heartbreaking is that i'm not allowed to help make things better.
instead we are all forced to revel in the garbage.
garbage garbage garbage!!!
forever it must be!!
garbage garbage garbage!!!
another intake of hitler youth. another 500+ all picked out to train to be medical students. it's soooooooooooooooooo competitive. they best do what they are told when they are told because they are told (get in there!!! cervical smears all around!!!!!!)
for the amusement of... rapist pedophile psychopaths.
seems to be the way of it.
we don't believe in informed consents.
i think they like to smear the newborn girls at birth.
they like to repeatedly damage their cervix from birth.
the repeated damage to their cervix from birth (from the repeated smears) they want to see what happens with that. how much cancer they can induce from repeatedly damaging the cervix from birth.
i think that's the idea.
that was one of the ideas.
see if they can make it more receptive to virus etc with all the repeated swabbing of the cervix.
i mean that's why gamma people need to have gamma babies. right?
for the amusement of some.
tee hee.
no?
so what do we do when people report that these sorts or kinds of things are happening? what is the process? how quickly are things sorted out?
never? why? because there aren't enough 'doctors' to go around.
i see.
and there never will be.
do you see why?
Posted by alexandra_k on February 12, 2022, at 16:24:32
In reply to i know most of it is pretty garbage, pretty sh*t, posted by alexandra_k on February 12, 2022, at 16:20:04
what if we repeatedly damage the nasopharynx? what if we really get in there, repeatedly with the nasal swab and really push it up hard and high and do that repeatedly...
will we create local damage so that there is a particularly nice little recipticle for the covid to really lodge up in there and get into the brain. hopefully. right? wouldn't we like to get the virus all up into some people's brain?
they used to do lobotomies up the nasal passage / cavity.
i wonder how much damage you can do to what with repeated nasal swabs.
there was a wide spectrum of different things that were reportted by people as to how invasive the nasal swabbing was felt to be...
and the upshot of it (where things are at now) is that tests have been developed that do not require a nasal swab to be pushed up into the pharynx.
saliva tests etc.
the nz government will not allow.
the nz goverment wants to do the population cull that NY etc got to do. killing off a bunch of undesirables.
but slow slow slow slow slow.
the nz government was too f*ck*ng slow.
so now the world's eyes are on it...
________
This is the end of the thread.
Psycho-Babble Social | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.