Shown: posts 16 to 40 of 47. Go back in thread:
Posted by payday on April 2, 2007, at 20:59:07
In reply to Re: Saw 'An Inconvenient Truth' today.. » Jay, posted by Michael83 on April 2, 2007, at 4:18:13
-to further expand your insight Michael83 you may wish to read an English novel, "The Fool of Quality" by H. Brooke, in which the protagonist is very much the Al Gore of the 1700's, with a high degree of virtue and generosity.
-the philosopher William Godwin expressed the view that men acted according to reason,
- that it was impossible to be rationally persuaded and not act accordingly,
-that reason taught benevolence and that rational being would live in harmony,-someone please publish the Pop-up book for George jr. to explain the above. Before the cartoon.
Posted by fayeroe on April 2, 2007, at 21:05:26
In reply to Re: Saw 'An Inconvenient Truth' today.. » fayeroe, posted by saturn on April 2, 2007, at 20:15:14
you were so down on Gore's lifestyle, i'm curious about yours.
i learned a lot about myself when i took the test. some good and some bad.
Posted by Declan on April 2, 2007, at 21:06:10
In reply to Re: Saw 'An Inconvenient Truth' today.., posted by payday on April 2, 2007, at 20:59:07
"The Fool of Quality" by H. Brooke.
Posted by Declan on April 2, 2007, at 21:08:19
In reply to Re: Saw 'An Inconvenient Truth' today.. » saturn, posted by fayeroe on April 2, 2007, at 21:05:26
Look, I leave the computer on all day and I'm planning a long overseas trip by jet.
We're doomed.
Posted by fayeroe on April 2, 2007, at 21:19:37
In reply to Re: Saw 'An Inconvenient Truth' today.. » fayeroe, posted by Declan on April 2, 2007, at 21:08:19
> Look, I leave the computer on all day and I'm planning a long overseas trip by jet.
>
> We're doomed.tsk, tsk, we are at that..........:-) couldn't you go by boat?? i went on a 10 day sailboat trip, in the Caribbean, and by my watch, we actually sailed for 45 minutes in 10 days. go figure that one out! we had an antsy pantsy boat captain..........i'll never forget the smell of the diesel.....instead of the saltwater........
Posted by Declan on April 2, 2007, at 21:24:17
In reply to Re: Saw 'An Inconvenient Truth' today.. » Declan, posted by fayeroe on April 2, 2007, at 21:19:37
Maybe a boat trip up one of those South East Asian Rivers while you still can before the Chinese dams stop them running?
The Salween, Mekong or Irrawaddy (then again, should keep away from Burma).
Posted by Declan on April 3, 2007, at 6:41:24
In reply to Re: Saw 'An Inconvenient Truth' today.. » fayeroe, posted by Declan on April 2, 2007, at 21:24:17
Thus far.....
Fuel consumption of American cars
Model T Ford......... 25mpg
Average for 1988.... 22.1mpg
Average for 2006.... 20.8mpg
Posted by fayeroe on April 3, 2007, at 14:34:14
In reply to Technological Solutions, posted by Declan on April 3, 2007, at 6:41:24
> Thus far.....
>
> Fuel consumption of American cars
>
> Model T Ford......... 25mpg
> Average for 1988.... 22.1mpg
> Average for 2006.... 20.8mpg
>interesting that we're going backwards, now isn't it? i drive a 99 Silverado Chevy pickituptruck and i get 21 mph......good maintenance and cruise control....plus the 99 is one of the best that they built. i'm hanging on to it.....i walk to work......walk to the grocery store and library. (dry my clothes on the line, blah, blah, blah :-) )
>
Posted by Declan on April 3, 2007, at 14:35:11
In reply to Technological Solutions, posted by Declan on April 3, 2007, at 6:41:24
In the UK
Airport passengers in 2005.........216M
Airport passengers for 2030........470MAmount to be spent
Widening the M1.........................3.6BPounds
On policies tackling climate change.....500MPounds
Tackling?
Has climate change has become a thing to be tackled?
No one ever talks about tackling terrorism.
The War on Terrorism and the Climate Change Tackle?
Must work like that.
Posted by Declan on April 3, 2007, at 14:52:57
In reply to Re: Technological Solutions » Declan, posted by fayeroe on April 3, 2007, at 14:34:14
From "The Right Man" by David Frumm
"I once made the mistake of suggesting to Bush that he use the phrase 'cheap energy' to describe the name of his energy policy. He gave me a sharp, squinting look, as if trying to decide whether I was the stupidest person he'd heard from all day or only one of the top five. Cheap energy, he answered, was how we got into this mess. Every year, from the early 1970s to the mid 1990s, American cars had burned less and less oil per mile travelled. Then in about 1995 that progress had stopped. Why? He answered his own question: because of the gas-guzzling SUV. And what had made the SUV possible? This time I answered 'Um, cheap energy?'. He nodded at me. Dismissed."
Posted by Declan on April 3, 2007, at 14:55:50
In reply to Re: Technological Solutions » fayeroe, posted by Declan on April 3, 2007, at 14:52:57
'A Memoir of a Boy in a Man's Prison'?
O my goodness.
Maybe I should believe in synchronicity?
Posted by fayeroe on April 3, 2007, at 15:05:37
In reply to Re: Technological Solutions, posted by Declan on April 3, 2007, at 14:55:50
i think you should.........i do........:-)
Posted by payday on April 3, 2007, at 18:13:11
In reply to Re: Saw 'An Inconvenient Truth' today.., posted by Declan on April 2, 2007, at 21:06:10
- Declan, jeting about like Gore, Bush and hopefully David Hicks. Leaving the PC on like the lights at Guantanamo Bay. Where do you draw the line, you lucky...lucky B....d.
Serially payday
Posted by Declan on April 3, 2007, at 19:24:15
In reply to Re: Saw 'An Inconvenient Truth' today.., posted by payday on April 3, 2007, at 18:13:11
Apropos of nothing, I would like to say that President Bush uses geothermal heat pumps on his ranch at Crawford, much like (I suppose) President Reagan eating organic beef.
That's what I like. Our leaders setting an example.
Posted by fayeroe on April 3, 2007, at 20:15:58
In reply to Re: Saw 'An Inconvenient Truth' today.. » payday, posted by Declan on April 3, 2007, at 19:24:15
> Apropos of nothing, I would like to say that President Bush uses geothermal heat pumps on his ranch at Crawford, much like (I suppose) President Reagan eating organic beef.
>
> That's what I like. Our leaders setting an example.yup, right.........right after he fires up his chainsaw..........to cut TREES down.........
Posted by fayeroe on April 3, 2007, at 20:16:52
In reply to Re: Saw 'An Inconvenient Truth' today.. » payday, posted by Declan on April 3, 2007, at 19:24:15
> Apropos of nothing, I would like to say that President Bush uses geothermal heat pumps on his ranch at Crawford, much like (I suppose) President Reagan eating organic beef.
>
> That's what I like. Our leaders setting an example.he doesn't live very far from me. couple of hours.......
Posted by Declan on April 3, 2007, at 20:30:57
In reply to Re: Saw 'An Inconvenient Truth' today.. » Declan, posted by fayeroe on April 3, 2007, at 20:15:58
Sixty years ago we could (I imagine) praise our leaders and never be suspected of irony.
Now all we have to do is praise them and it sounds like an insult.
Interesting.
Posted by fayeroe on April 3, 2007, at 20:38:47
In reply to Re: Saw 'An Inconvenient Truth' today.. » fayeroe, posted by Declan on April 3, 2007, at 20:30:57
> Sixty years ago we could (I imagine) praise our leaders and never be suspected of irony.
>
> Now all we have to do is praise them and it sounds like an insult.
>
> Interesting.
kinda hard to disguise the truth..........
Posted by Declan on April 3, 2007, at 20:41:44
In reply to Re: Saw 'An Inconvenient Truth' today.., posted by fayeroe on April 3, 2007, at 20:38:47
That must be it.
Is that the same thing people mean when they say we have entered a phase beyond irony?
Posted by Declan on April 3, 2007, at 20:45:19
In reply to Re: Saw 'An Inconvenient Truth' today.. » fayeroe, posted by Declan on April 3, 2007, at 20:41:44
This one is famous.
Dick Cheney's Empire Christmas Card
24dec03
"If a sparrow can fall to the ground without His notice,
is it likely that an empire can rise without His help?"
Posted by fayeroe on April 3, 2007, at 20:45:29
In reply to Re: Saw 'An Inconvenient Truth' today.. » fayeroe, posted by Declan on April 3, 2007, at 20:41:44
> That must be it.
>
> Is that the same thing people mean when they say we have entered a phase beyond irony?i believe that is what they are thinking......... do you think it is a widely understood theory???????????
Posted by Declan on April 3, 2007, at 20:47:46
In reply to Re: Saw 'An Inconvenient Truth' today.. » Declan, posted by fayeroe on April 3, 2007, at 20:45:29
No, probably not, Pat.
> > That must be it.
> >
> > Is that the same thing people mean when they say we have entered a phase beyond irony?
>
> i believe that is what they are thinking......... do you think it is a widely understood theory???????????
>
Posted by lil' jimi on April 4, 2007, at 1:10:47
In reply to Saw 'An Inconvenient Truth' today.., posted by Jay on April 1, 2007, at 19:38:50
Posted by Fivefires on April 4, 2007, at 17:59:04
In reply to Re: Saw 'An Inconvenient Truth' today.. » Jay, posted by lil' jimi on April 4, 2007, at 1:10:47
All u guys have watched the movie and validated my hesitation at doing so!
I can't see utube.com Jay. Pute is new w/ compatible features I'm sure, but I don't know how to set.
I'm less likely 'to worry re: children' now.
This site doesn't miss a thing!
whew, 5f
Posted by Meri-Tuuli on April 8, 2007, at 3:31:37
In reply to Saw 'An Inconvenient Truth' today.., posted by Jay on April 1, 2007, at 19:38:50
If so, then I have wasted an awful lot of money and time and effort in my education.
Its not a myth. Its very real! There are masses and masses of scientific studies to back (human induced) climate change up. Not one study refutes the idea.
Scientists publish data based on fact. Its that simple. We don't make it up or there's no consipracy between us. Actually I wish there were, because that would mean that climate change isn't going to happen, but it is, unfortuantely.
Anyway, its not all doom and gloom. There are some very interesting technological developments going on. That said, I think we need to change our habits, particulary those on certain continents.
And anyway the oceans will absorb most of the human induced carbon dioxide anyway - but then, that will take around 2000 years, and who knows what will happen to the planet (and us humans) in that time. And all that carbon dioxide being drawn down into the oceans will make them more acidic - which the critters that live down there now won't particulary like. But anyway.....
It is mighty sad that Gore didn't get in. I really wish he had.
Go forward in thread:
Psycho-Babble Politics | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD, bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.