Shown: posts 13 to 37 of 53. Go back in thread:
Posted by Bobby on April 28, 2006, at 20:54:13
In reply to Re: No, not really » Bobby, posted by AuntieMel on April 28, 2006, at 16:06:51
I must agree with some of what you said---but when we pay $6000 in state taxes---call me selfish,but I want some of it spent on my kids. President Fox of Mexico has never tried to hide that fact that they were sending us the lowest class Mexico has to offer and that is how they will invade us---using our own system. Now for homework, check and see what it takes to get a work visa to work in Mexico. Mexicans plan to boycott America on May 1---don't buy anything, don't go to work, ect... Personally I am saving
my money to go on a spending spree on May 1.
I know plenty of good hearted, hard working Mexicans who do contribute to our society-----that's not the issue. It's the inevitable collapse of our social services, school sytems and working class Americans who DO want those jobs because of the sheer numbers of illegal aliens who are begining to sink the ship. Yes, I'm worried about my familie's future.
Posted by gardenergirl on April 28, 2006, at 21:57:12
In reply to Re: No, not really » AuntieMel, posted by Bobby on April 28, 2006, at 20:54:13
Mexico is planning to invade us?
gg
Posted by Bobby on April 28, 2006, at 22:46:57
In reply to Re: No, not really » Bobby, posted by gardenergirl on April 28, 2006, at 21:57:12
figuratively and quite literally---they already are/have. I tend to quite liberal, but when I look at the facts(Yes I read up-as I encourage all to), It is a very unsettling picture being painted in our front yard----sorta like the graffiti I see sprayed on walls and builings. SOMEBODY is going to have to pay for this finacially. It may be you and me giving up Social security--and todays children---God help them. Am I suffering from delusions?
Posted by Dr. Bob on May 1, 2006, at 21:55:50
In reply to Re: No, not really » AuntieMel, posted by Bobby on April 28, 2006, at 20:54:13
> the lowest class Mexico has to offer
I'm sorry your family isn't more secure, but please be sensitive to the feelings of those here from Mexico.
But please don't take this personally, this doesn't mean I don't like you or think you're a bad person.
If you or others have questions about this or about posting policies in general, or are interested in alternative ways of expressing yourself, please first see the FAQ:
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faq.html#civil
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faq.html#enforceFollow-ups regarding these issues should be redirected to Psycho-Babble Administration. They, as well as replies to the above post, should of course themselves be civil.
Thanks,
Bob
Posted by henrietta on May 5, 2006, at 15:32:53
In reply to Re: No, not really » AuntieMel, posted by Bobby on April 28, 2006, at 20:54:13
I'm glad you've got the money to go on a spending spree. I didn't purchase anything all week, so maybe I balanced you out, but I doubt it. Judging from the state taxes you pay, I'd say you have a lot more financial security (and mad money) than I do, so my small protest probably couldn't counter yours.
By the way, in case you're interested, I have felt extremely hurt and greatly offended by your posts on this thread.
Posted by henrietta on May 5, 2006, at 19:04:24
In reply to Re: No, not really Bobby, posted by henrietta on May 5, 2006, at 15:32:53
your research? Provide references, links, whatever? (You encouraged us to look into the subject.) I'm particularly interested in the statistics you discovered relating to the negative effect on Social Security caused by immigrants as opposed to other factors. Thanks.
Posted by henrietta on May 5, 2006, at 19:07:18
In reply to hey bobby could you share, posted by henrietta on May 5, 2006, at 19:04:24
have? Personally, I believe in ZPG. What's your view?
Posted by henrietta on May 5, 2006, at 19:09:10
In reply to Re: hey bobby how many kids do you, posted by henrietta on May 5, 2006, at 19:07:18
do you drive?
Posted by henrietta on May 5, 2006, at 19:30:57
In reply to Re: hey bobby what kind of car, posted by henrietta on May 5, 2006, at 19:09:10
In my experience most of the "illegals getting a free ride" are native peoples, Indians. Just like our North American Indians. Ancient cultures who were invaded by Europeans, their lands stolen, their cultures destroyed. And they've been persecuted, financially enslaved, kept in poverty for a couple hundred years by invaders. By people who stole their land.
As for Dinah's reservations about "material gains", I must ask what is meant by that? Is it "material" to want to teach your children to read? To feed your children? To provide a modicum of health care to your children? Do "material" matters include living in a trailor that's not so riddled with mold and mildew that your children are constantly sick? Or is materialism about being able to see a theapist 2 times a week (and willfully refusing to "improve" so you can have lifetime therapy?) and finding a private school that precisely suits the needs of your child?
I'm sorry if I have some trouble with others' interpretations of "materialism". And with others' interpretations of "invasion".
PS Sorry, too that I got Colbert's name wrong. It's Stephen Colbert.
Posted by henrietta on May 6, 2006, at 0:53:19
In reply to history bobby, posted by henrietta on May 5, 2006, at 19:30:57
I am truly sorry I was not able to remain civil in my above posts. I regret any hurt I may have caused, and will readily accept a very long and well-deserved block.
henrietta
Posted by Estella on May 7, 2006, at 1:43:20
In reply to Apology, posted by henrietta on May 6, 2006, at 0:53:19
i feel sad when people don't think everyone has a right to life (hence society has a duty to provide enough for basic needs being met for ALL HUMAN BEINGS)
because...
of feeling insecure that ones own family won't have certain 'luxuries' ('luxuries' i mean in comparison to basic needs like some kind of shelter, food, basic healthcare and education etc etc)
i feel very sad about that indeed.
(((((((hen))))))))
Posted by Dinah on May 7, 2006, at 3:33:17
In reply to history bobby, posted by henrietta on May 5, 2006, at 19:30:57
> Or is materialism about being able to see a theapist 2 times a week and finding a private school that precisely suits the needs of your child?
Yes, if I recall my point correctly, and I'm not sure I do, it occurred to me to wonder if that was a good definition of a better life. Or a worse one, for that matter. Or if it was even culturally insensitive of me to judge any one way of life as being better than another.
As long, of course, as basic necessities are being met.
My grandpa used to pick expired products out of supermarket trash bins, because that was the only way to get "luxuries" like store bought pickles or store bought bread. There wasn't much in his fridge that didn't have a big black X on it. But he and my grandma appeared to be happy people, at peace with themselves. By material standards, perhaps not overly successful, by other measures enormously so.
Posted by zazenduck on May 7, 2006, at 12:44:15
In reply to Apology, posted by henrietta on May 6, 2006, at 0:53:19
what are you doing in a place like this?
Posted by henrietta on May 7, 2006, at 19:59:16
In reply to hen is a wise passionate chick » henrietta, posted by zazenduck on May 7, 2006, at 12:44:15
Thank you so much
Posted by henrietta on May 7, 2006, at 20:57:16
In reply to thank you star and duck, posted by henrietta on May 7, 2006, at 19:59:16
You've no idea how much that meant to me. again, thank you.
hen
Posted by Bobby on May 7, 2006, at 21:11:47
In reply to Estella and Zazenduck, posted by henrietta on May 7, 2006, at 20:57:16
I'm part native american--doesn'that give me free reign to get rid of the europeons?
Posted by Estella on May 8, 2006, at 5:48:14
In reply to Re: Estella and Zazenduck, posted by Bobby on May 7, 2006, at 21:11:47
> I'm part native american--doesn'that give me free reign to get rid of the europeons?
what do you think?
was anybody in the us before the native americans?
reperation... i think you are owed one hell of a lot in reparation.
a lot of what was done to the american indians was shameful.
giving them blankets infested with small pox and relocating them to canada... stuff like that.
a lot of things like that happened in nz too. to the maori (indigenous people of nz). don't think anybody was here before them (though that is a bit arguable).
they were invited to church at which point the doors were barred shut and the church was set on fire.
they are owed reperation imho.
years of racism thereafter...
they are owed reperation.
but then i also think... that all human beings have a right to life. my understanding was that your ancestors were pretty nice and friendly to the immigrants to america. your ancestors got f*cked over. badly. that sucks. but imho... don't perpeptuate the cycle. there are people from mexico and africa etc etc who are having a little trouble.
remember your roots...
i know people think i'm crazy...
but better to die with a clean conscience
but that being said
i understand the rage
Posted by Estella on May 8, 2006, at 10:07:26
In reply to Estella and Zazenduck, posted by henrietta on May 7, 2006, at 20:57:16
you are beautiful hen.
i'm sorry we didn't get the chance to talk more.
i have some idea how much it means...
oh yes indeed i do.
take care.
Posted by henrietta on May 8, 2006, at 15:00:09
In reply to Re: Estella and Zazenduck » henrietta, posted by Estella on May 8, 2006, at 10:07:26
Thank you, Estella Star.
You're beautiful, too. Please take good care of yourself. I'm going to try to stay away, not even lurk. But you'll be lurking in my heart, dear. ((((EstellaK)))))
hen
Posted by Estella on May 9, 2006, at 4:17:46
In reply to Estella, posted by henrietta on May 8, 2006, at 15:00:09
top 10% over half the wealth of the country...
why is it that there isn't more money in social services...
?
the average joe thinks the average joe must suffer if this and that happens
but the top 10% have over half the wealth...
the problem isn't shortage of wealth IMHO
it is a problem in the distribution
I don't think the US needs more money (it is the richest country in the world)
I think the US needs to worry about a fairer distribution (the top 10% don't need all that money. and people... good hard working americans... illegal immigrants... those are the ones that suffer)
Posted by Sobriquet Style on May 9, 2006, at 7:05:33
In reply to Re: Estella, posted by Estella on May 9, 2006, at 4:17:46
>I don't think the US needs more money (it is the richest country in the world)
I used to think that, but it isn't exactly, depending on how you're viewing who richest using GDP, per capita and/or GNP.
http://www.aneki.com/richest.html
http://www.economist.com/theWorldIn/international/displayStory.cfm?story_id=3372495&d=2005
http://worldatlas.com/geoquiz/thelist.htm
Interesting read...
~
Posted by gardenergirl on May 9, 2006, at 13:00:49
In reply to Re: Estella, posted by Estella on May 9, 2006, at 4:17:46
You know, when I get to thinking about that, I usually end up saying, "How much money does someone need, anyway?" And "How does someone spend all that money?"
But then, I'm often called an idealist.
gg
Posted by wildcardII on May 9, 2006, at 13:02:55
In reply to Re: Estella » Estella, posted by gardenergirl on May 9, 2006, at 13:00:49
~i often wonder how that 10% can spend so much on things when so many are suffering???????????
Posted by Estella on May 10, 2006, at 1:43:12
In reply to Re: Estella, posted by Sobriquet Style on May 9, 2006, at 7:05:33
that is interesting.
and yet still...
http://www.aneki.com/billionaires.html
and so when it comes to the distribution of wealth within the country...
i could be wrong...
but my understanding is that the USA has the biggest imbalance in the distribution of wealth (from within the country) in the developed world.
Posted by Estella on May 10, 2006, at 1:49:47
In reply to Re: Estella » Estella, posted by gardenergirl on May 9, 2006, at 13:00:49
> You know, when I get to thinking about that, I usually end up saying, "How much money does someone need, anyway?" And "How does someone spend all that money?"
I think more money buys you more power and social status. So if you have one billion more than that person down the road that probably buys you more power and social status than that guy down the road...
I don't think they spend all that money.
I think now matter how much you have...
People probably still live in fear that it will be taken away.
From their decsendents...
From their future generations...In fact... Sometimes I think the less you have the less you have to lose (so long as basic needs are met...)
But power...
I think it is about power and status really.
I mean... Imagine if you got to nay or yay research funding...
Imagine if you got to be known as a generous donor
Imagine the power in being top CEO
The company vehicles flights holidays conferences
Funny how those with money...
Don't seem to need to spend much of it...Hmm
HrmBut IMHO it isn't the middle class who need to lose out in order for everyone to have their basic needs met...
But would we be able to learn to be happy with being middle class...
Without the dream of hitting the top, without the dream of our descendents hitting the top?
Being a millionare... Being a billionare...
The potential for that.Is that what freedom for the pursuit of happiness means?
Or is that one interpretation on freedom for the persuit of happiness?
Pursuit of happiness at what cost????????????
Go forward in thread:
Psycho-Babble Politics | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD, bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.