![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 1 to 17 of 17. This is the beginning of the thread.
Posted by Lou Pilder on December 10, 2008, at 5:52:13
Mr. Hsiung and his deputies,
I sent a notification on 12/7/08 that is outstanding.
Lou Pilder
Posted by Lou Pilder on December 20, 2008, at 16:25:33
In reply to Lou's reminder to the administration-owtstn, posted by Lou Pilder on December 10, 2008, at 5:52:13
> Mr. Hsiung and his deputies,
> I sent a notification on 12/7/08 that is outstanding.
> Lou PilderMr. Hsiung and his deputies,
In regards to your policy to keep reminding you, the above.
I am also requesting that I be allowed to post the post in the notification here until you address the post in question in its thread or email me or bmail me with your answer as to why you are allowing the statement in question to stand. This could allow other members IMO to see and discuss the issues involved so that they could make their own determination as to why the notification is outstanding. This I think could be good for the community as a whole.
I would like for interested members that are considering to post in this thread to read what is in the threads that a few links bring up because I think that could give more clarification to the issues here and in parallel threads.
One involves that the administration is an administration of what is generally known as that {time is of the essence}. Mr. Hsiung uses the analogy of that a fire can spread quickly and that his philospophy is to not wait untill there is a forest fire to address things here. I am asking the administration if that applies or does not apply to notifications here.(citation Smohkeigh).
There are other links that cover some things that I also think could be helpfull to review.
Lou Pilder
(citation Smohkeigh)
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20040112/msgs/307041.html
other links to posts to threads
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20081003/msgs/856892.html
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20081003/msgs/859548.html
Posted by Deputy 10derHeart on December 22, 2008, at 4:43:51
In reply to Lou's reminder to the administration-owtstn, posted by Lou Pilder on December 10, 2008, at 5:52:13
Posted by Lou Pilder on January 3, 2009, at 16:00:58
In reply to Lou, please check your email. Thx. (nm) » Lou Pilder, posted by Deputy 10derHeart on December 22, 2008, at 4:43:51
you wrote,[...check email....],
What do you want for me to check in my emails to me?
Lou
Posted by 10derHeart on January 3, 2009, at 18:19:23
In reply to Lou's reply-whtdachk? » Deputy 10derHeart, posted by Lou Pilder on January 3, 2009, at 16:00:58
The day I wrote this, Dr. Bob Babblemailed you regarding the notification from 12/7.
Posted by Lou Pilder on January 4, 2009, at 8:31:16
In reply to Re: Lou's reply-whtdachk? » Lou Pilder, posted by 10derHeart on January 3, 2009, at 18:19:23
> The day I wrote this, Dr. Bob Babblemailed you regarding the notification from 12/7.
you wrote,[...mailed you regarding the notification...]
Do you have a copy of that to you? Or do you know of the content by some other means or not at all?
Lou
Posted by 10derHeart on January 4, 2009, at 13:13:27
In reply to Lou's reply-duyunoh? » 10derHeart, posted by Lou Pilder on January 4, 2009, at 8:31:16
Yes, I'll send you a copy.
Posted by Lou Pilder on January 4, 2009, at 17:48:27
In reply to Re: Lou's reply-whtdachk? » Lou Pilder, posted by 10derHeart on January 3, 2009, at 18:19:23
> The day I wrote this, Dr. Bob Babblemailed you regarding the notification from 12/7.
you wrote,
[...regarding the notification...].
In {regarding},is it or is it not your opinion that the email states a reason as to {why the post in question is allowed to stand}? If you think that it does, would you be willing to have a three way discussion with an impartial third party that is a grammatical expert to make a determination as to if the granmmatical structure in the email does or does not give a reason as to why the post is allowed to stand?
Lou
Posted by Deputy 10derHeart on January 4, 2009, at 20:56:25
In reply to Lou's reply-eghvhd? » 10derHeart, posted by Lou Pilder on January 4, 2009, at 17:48:27
Lou,
My understanding is that the message asks you a question. Other than saying that, I'm not at all comfortable discussing a Babblemail from Dr. Bob to you. Since *he* wrote to *you,* please contact Dr. Bob by Babblemail or email with your questions about its content.
Dr. Bob chose to act/not act on that notification personally, so I'd rather not be involved any further.
Thanks.-10derheart
Posted by Lou Pilder on January 9, 2009, at 6:53:29
In reply to Re: Lou's reply-eghvhd? » Lou Pilder, posted by Deputy 10derHeart on January 4, 2009, at 20:56:25
> Lou,
>
> My understanding is that the message asks you a question. Other than saying that, I'm not at all comfortable discussing a Babblemail from Dr. Bob to you. Since *he* wrote to *you,* please contact Dr. Bob by Babblemail or email with your questions about its content.
>
> Dr. Bob chose to act/not act on that notification personally, so I'd rather not be involved any further.
>
> Thanks.
>
> -10derheartYou wrote,[...contact (Mr. Hsiung)...]
Mr. Hsiung has posted here that he is aware of outstanding emails from me to him. I have not received replys so could you post here your opinion as to if there could be an expection for me to receive a reply from him if I was to email him concerning this situation? If so, what could be in your opinion the criteria that could give me that expection verses the outstanding emails from me to him?
There is also a post from Mr. Hsiung to me that he states that replies are from all of the deputies. (citation duazipsiegh 6)
Could you add some more infomation as to if I could use some othe means to receive infomation concerning this ongoing situation?
Lou
(citation duazisiegh 6)
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20061018/msgs/704782.html
Posted by Dr. Bob on January 11, 2009, at 3:43:17
In reply to Lou's reply-duaz » Deputy 10derHeart, posted by Lou Pilder on January 9, 2009, at 6:53:29
> Mr. Hsiung has posted here that he is aware of outstanding emails from me to him.
Are there still? If so, could you please resend them? Thanks,
Bob
Posted by Lou Pilder on January 12, 2009, at 16:39:02
In reply to Re: Lou's reply, posted by Dr. Bob on January 11, 2009, at 3:43:17
> > Mr. Hsiung has posted here that he is aware of outstanding emails from me to him.
>
> Are there still? If so, could you please resend them? Thanks,
>
> BobMr. Hsiung,
You wrote,[...could you..resend them? (the emails from me to you)...].
That is interesting that you wrote such here for you have posted that it is your philosophy that things be attended to in the analogy that you used that you do not wait unbtil there is a forest fire and I think that more could be posted here concerning this ongoing situation.
I have posted here that I think that by you asking me to send again either an email or a notification to you that that would be having an additional condition to me and that I would not submit to additional conditions by the administration here. There is also the question of the time lag that can be siginificant even if I did submit to any additional conditions to have a notification acted upon or receive a reply to an email.
I also posted here that I would be glad to send them again if:
A. You and all the deputies post individually here that each of you do not have the notification from me and
B. That you have no rememberence of it
C. that there is no other way for you to get the notification except if I send it to you again, which means that you have communicated with each other concerning that and that you have searched your records and the notification ,or in this case an email, has been deleted by yourself or someone else or that it disappeard from some other way from your records.
I am unsure as to what time lines there could be if I did resend them to you because the grammatical structure of your statement does not state that you will reply in a particular time frame even if I did resend them.
Here are some links of this and also a link to a post that I have outstanding questions concerning your policy here so that if you are wanting to now respond to those, you could use this time to start on that one.
Lou Pilder
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20080719/msgs/840971.html
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20040112/msgs/307041.html
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20070702/msgs/768966.html
Posted by gardenergirl on January 13, 2009, at 14:32:47
In reply to Lou's reply to Mr. Hsiung- » Dr. Bob, posted by Lou Pilder on January 12, 2009, at 16:39:02
Posted by Lou Pilder on January 14, 2009, at 10:51:52
In reply to There goes that bus with those wheels.... (nm), posted by gardenergirl on January 13, 2009, at 14:32:47
gardenergirl,
You wrote,[...that bus..with those wheels...].
I am unsure as to why you posted such. Could you identify if there is significance to, what;
A. The bus could be representing?
B. what the wheels are?
C. what those wheels could do to what?
D. if the bus does or does not have passengers in it?
E. if so, who are the passengers if you know?
F. who is driving the bus if you know?
G. is this representing a song title? if so, could it be:
1. I'm a Steamroller Baby (James Taylor)
2. These boots were made for walking (Sinatra)
3. Ding Ding Ding goes the Trolly (Judy Garland)
4. 60 ways to leave your lover (Paul Simon)
5. How Can You Laugh When You Know I'm Down (Beatles)
6. other not listed
If you could post the significance, if any, of your post, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly.
Lou
Posted by Sigismund on January 14, 2009, at 16:47:56
In reply to Lou's request for a divulgence » gardenergirl, posted by Lou Pilder on January 14, 2009, at 10:51:52
It's that kids song Lou
'The wheels on the bus go round and round'.
Posted by Lou Pilder on January 19, 2009, at 21:15:02
In reply to Lou's reply to Mr. Hsiung- » Dr. Bob, posted by Lou Pilder on January 12, 2009, at 16:39:02
> > > Mr. Hsiung has posted here that he is aware of outstanding emails from me to him.
> >
> > Are there still? If so, could you please resend them? Thanks,
> >
> > Bob
>
> Mr. Hsiung,
> You wrote,[...could you..resend them? (the emails from me to you)...].
> That is interesting that you wrote such here for you have posted that it is your philosophy that things be attended to in the analogy that you used that you do not wait unbtil there is a forest fire and I think that more could be posted here concerning this ongoing situation.
> I have posted here that I think that by you asking me to send again either an email or a notification to you that that would be having an additional condition to me and that I would not submit to additional conditions by the administration here. There is also the question of the time lag that can be siginificant even if I did submit to any additional conditions to have a notification acted upon or receive a reply to an email.
> I also posted here that I would be glad to send them again if:
> A. You and all the deputies post individually here that each of you do not have the notification from me and
> B. That you have no rememberence of it
> C. that there is no other way for you to get the notification except if I send it to you again, which means that you have communicated with each other concerning that and that you have searched your records and the notification ,or in this case an email, has been deleted by yourself or someone else or that it disappeard from some other way from your records.
> I am unsure as to what time lines there could be if I did resend them to you because the grammatical structure of your statement does not state that you will reply in a particular time frame even if I did resend them.
> Here are some links of this and also a link to a post that I have outstanding questions concerning your policy here so that if you are wanting to now respond to those, you could use this time to start on that one.
> Lou Pilder
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20080719/msgs/840971.html
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20040112/msgs/307041.html
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20070702/msgs/768966.html
>Mr. Hsiung,
Your reply to me could mean that you are interested in having dialog with me here.
I think that instead of using that time for that, that if that be the case, that we have dialog concerning other outstanding requests such as;
Lou
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20081003/msgs/861827.html
Posted by Lou Pilder on January 29, 2009, at 8:00:28
In reply to Lou's reminder to the administration-owtstn, posted by Lou Pilder on December 10, 2008, at 5:52:13
> Mr. Hsiung and his deputies,
> I sent a notification on 12/7/08 that is outstanding.
> Lou PilderMr. Hsiung and his deputies,
In regards to your procedure to keep reminding you, the above.
Lou Pilder
This is the end of the thread.
Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.