![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 1 to 11 of 11. This is the beginning of the thread.
Posted by Lou Pilder on February 25, 2008, at 16:21:58
Mr. Hsiung,
I am requesting that you delete from your TOS the part that deputies, and yourself, can delete grossly inappropriate posts.
I base this in part on that you have posted that you do not delete all grossly inappropriate posts.(citation G2)
In a community that has the tOS to mean that there is an expectation for grossly inappropriate posts top be removed, and members ask for them to be deleted and you are unwilling to do so for any reason, then I feel that the confidence of the forum's administration could be lost. For if one part of the TOS is not being applied, then other parts IMO have the potential to also not be applied in a fair manner.
Since your TOS states that you do what in your thinking will be good for the community as a whole, and be fair, then I am asking you to post here what rationale you have to allow you to leave grossly inapropriate posts on the board when your TOS says that deputies can delete them and then you repost it.
Lou PIlder
citation G2
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20060317/msgs625505.html
Posted by Lou Pilder on February 25, 2008, at 16:24:04
In reply to Lou's request to Robert Hsiung-nonfez, posted by Lou Pilder on February 25, 2008, at 16:21:58
> Mr. Hsiung,
> I am requesting that you delete from your TOS the part that deputies, and yourself, can delete grossly inappropriate posts.
> I base this in part on that you have posted that you do not delete all grossly inappropriate posts.(citation G2)
> In a community that has the tOS to mean that there is an expectation for grossly inappropriate posts top be removed, and members ask for them to be deleted and you are unwilling to do so for any reason, then I feel that the confidence of the forum's administration could be lost. For if one part of the TOS is not being applied, then other parts IMO have the potential to also not be applied in a fair manner.
> Since your TOS states that you do what in your thinking will be good for the community as a whole, and be fair, then I am asking you to post here what rationale you have to allow you to leave grossly inapropriate posts on the board when your TOS says that deputies can delete them and then you repost it.
> Lou PIlder
> citation G2
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20060317/msgs625505.html
corrected linkhttp://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20060317/msgs/625505.html
Posted by Lou Pilder on February 25, 2008, at 16:47:47
In reply to Lou's request to Robert Hsiung-corrected link, posted by Lou Pilder on February 25, 2008, at 16:24:04
> > Mr. Hsiung,
> > I am requesting that you delete from your TOS the part that deputies, and yourself, can delete grossly inappropriate posts.
> > I base this in part on that you have posted that you do not delete all grossly inappropriate posts.(citation G2)
> > In a community that has the tOS to mean that there is an expectation for grossly inappropriate posts top be removed, and members ask for them to be deleted and you are unwilling to do so for any reason, then I feel that the confidence of the forum's administration could be lost. For if one part of the TOS is not being applied, then other parts IMO have the potential to also not be applied in a fair manner.
> > Since your TOS states that you do what in your thinking will be good for the community as a whole, and be fair, then I am asking you to post here what rationale you have to allow you to leave grossly inapropriate posts on the board when your TOS says that deputies can delete them and then you repost it.
> > Lou PIlder
> > citation G2
> > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20060317/msgs625505.html
> corrected link
>
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20060317/msgs/625505.htmlMr. Hsiung,
I am asking you to consider the content in the post (citation G3)
For there are members here that I think that your site has given them a declaration of allowing grossly inappropriate posts to be deleted by the nature of your TOS here. Your TOS to me could be an expectation that posts that are grossly inappropriate could be deleted. In post G3, what could in your thinking after reading that post, be good for the community as a whole to not delete any post that is grossly inappropriate?
Lou
citation G3
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20080204/msgs/814591.html
Posted by star008 on February 25, 2008, at 21:19:33
In reply to Lou's request to Robert Hsiung-nonfez, posted by Lou Pilder on February 25, 2008, at 16:21:58
Lou
your points are valid and I understand what you are trying to say but I am thinking you are going to get someone irritated and you will get blocked again like you did last time.. one post I was refferring to was on the p board and I replied to it and got blocked.. I just felt mortified and didn't think to word my response correctly
Posted by Lou Pilder on February 25, 2008, at 21:43:13
In reply to Re: Lou's request to Robert Hsiung-nonfez » Lou Pilder, posted by star008 on February 25, 2008, at 21:19:33
> Lou
>
> your points are valid and I understand what you are trying to say but I am thinking you are going to get someone irritated and you will get blocked again like you did last time.. one post I was refferring to was on the p board and I replied to it and got blocked.. I just felt mortified and didn't think to word my response correctlystar008,
You wrote,[...your points are valid...someone will get irritated...the last time...]
If you could clarify the following, I would appreciate it:
A. Will someone here get irritated because my points are valid?
B. If so, why, in your opinion, could a person get irritated by reading valid points and if so, why?
C. What was {the last time} that you are referring to?
Lou
Posted by Sigismund on February 26, 2008, at 17:17:21
In reply to Lou's reply to Ssar008-valponts » star008, posted by Lou Pilder on February 25, 2008, at 21:43:13
Lou
What does TOS mean?
Posted by 10derHeart on February 26, 2008, at 17:55:34
In reply to Re: Lou's reply to Ssar008-valponts » Lou Pilder, posted by Sigismund on February 26, 2008, at 17:17:21
Posted by adelaide curtis on February 27, 2008, at 12:56:53
In reply to TOS=Terms of Service (e.g. on a website) (nm) » Sigismund, posted by 10derHeart on February 26, 2008, at 17:55:34
dr bob, what are the rules of your server about posting material that is unappropriate?
can we go to your server and ask for post to be deleted?
yes, i believe we can.
Posted by muffled on February 27, 2008, at 13:02:27
In reply to servers..., posted by adelaide curtis on February 27, 2008, at 12:56:53
Posted by star008 on March 5, 2008, at 21:32:12
In reply to Lou's reply to Ssar008-valponts » star008, posted by Lou Pilder on February 25, 2008, at 21:43:13
Lou
sorry for the delay, i was out of town. I was referring to the time when you were trying to defend phillipa and got blocked even though your points were valid. In my opinion you irritated someone and got blocked.
Posted by Lou Pilder on March 6, 2008, at 4:50:31
In reply to Re: Lou's reply to Ssar008-valponts, posted by star008 on March 5, 2008, at 21:32:12
> Lou
> sorry for the delay, i was out of town. I was referring to the time when you were trying to defend phillipa and got blocked even though your points were valid. In my opinion you irritated someone and got blocked.star008,
You wrote,[...defend Phillipa...even though your points were valid...were blocked because... irritated someone...].
This brings up to me a want for infomation. Could you email it to me if you do not want to post a reply to me here?
A. Who,in your opinion, was or were irritated?
B. Was, in your opinion, the irritation because I defended Phillipa?
C. Was the irritation, in your opinion, because my points were valid?
D. would it, in your opinion, be the same if I was defending someone other than Phillipa?
E. In your opinion, if you think that it will not be good for the community as a whole, what could be any unsound mental-health practice indicated by the actions of the administration in regards to my valid points?
F. other aspects not mentioned
Loulpilder_1188@fuse.net
(there is an underscore between my name and 1188)
This is the end of the thread.
Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.