Psycho-Babble Administration Thread 466899

Shown: posts 1 to 25 of 67. This is the beginning of the thread.

 

Re: possibly being able to do more to help

Posted by Dr. Bob on March 5, 2005, at 9:28:17

In reply to Re: Okay, WHERE ARE YOU MATT MC?, posted by Dinah on March 4, 2005, at 11:26:10

> while I find it frustrating that we can't do more to help on Babble, other than inform Dr. Bob or try to get a person to reach out in real life, I also find it the very thing that allows me to be active here. If I felt like I could do something for suicidal posters, the responsibility would overwhelm me.

I've been wondering about trying to enable concerned posters to notify a suicidal poster's Internet service provider. So it wouldn't depend so much on my availability. It would of course need to be set up carefully. Information that identified the suicidal poster wouldn't be disclosed to the concerned posters, for example. What do you think? Would that be overwhelming?

Bob

 

Re: possibly being able to do more to help » Dr. Bob

Posted by Larry Hoover on March 5, 2005, at 9:56:18

In reply to Re: possibly being able to do more to help, posted by Dr. Bob on March 5, 2005, at 9:28:17

> > while I find it frustrating that we can't do more to help on Babble, other than inform Dr. Bob or try to get a person to reach out in real life, I also find it the very thing that allows me to be active here. If I felt like I could do something for suicidal posters, the responsibility would overwhelm me.
>
> I've been wondering about trying to enable concerned posters to notify a suicidal poster's Internet service provider. So it wouldn't depend so much on my availability. It would of course need to be set up carefully. Information that identified the suicidal poster wouldn't be disclosed to the concerned posters, for example. What do you think? Would that be overwhelming?
>
> Bob

Although your heart is in the right place, Bob, I'm immediately concerned about the potential for misusing this potential feature. I surely don't want the cops coming knocking on my door because somebody has decided to misuse/abuse it. Why say something that might get you blocked when you can send the cops instead?

Lar

 

Re: possibly being able to do more to help » Dr. Bob

Posted by Dinah on March 5, 2005, at 10:32:57

In reply to Re: possibly being able to do more to help, posted by Dr. Bob on March 5, 2005, at 9:28:17

Not to mention the difficulty in assessing the difference between ideation and intent. I wouldn't want someone sending the cops to the door because I was expressing ideation.

It's even difficult for you, isn't it? Even my own therapist struggles with the right thing to do with *me*, and he knows me.

I think *I* would find it a bit overwhelming. Feeling like if I had done something, someone might not have died. Or taking the chance of causing problems in a person's life by pressing the button too easily.

 

Re: possibly being able to do more to help » Dr. Bob

Posted by rainbowbrite on March 5, 2005, at 11:15:16

In reply to Re: possibly being able to do more to help, posted by Dr. Bob on March 5, 2005, at 9:28:17

Just a thought.... could there be a separtate email account for this sort of thing that you check? I don't know if that is feasable for you .....but an alert Dr Bob account? I don't know maybe its a stupid idea.

 

Re: possibly being able to do more to help » Dr. Bob

Posted by alexandra_k on March 5, 2005, at 15:02:51

In reply to Re: possibly being able to do more to help, posted by Dr. Bob on March 5, 2005, at 9:28:17

Yeah, I agree with Larry that I don't think you want everyone to be able to do that.

And I think you might have trouble finding volounteers for that one.

I wouldn't be prepared to deal with the consequences for making a bad call either way. Even the consequences of making a good call.

Now I might get jumped on for this but...

I don't know why people insist on posting that kind of stuff. There is the ER, there is ones local Lifeline or equivalent, there is the Samaritans... You ask them NOT TO POST that kind of stuff here. I don't understand why people do that and I don't understand why they don't consider the effect it has on posters here a little more.

If there was a standard thing to say about this to that effect ie. that it is inappropriate to post that kind of stuff along with a link to alternative avenues of help then I wouldn't have a problem posting a link to that.

But that is where it stops.

I am not prepared to make a call with such important consequences. No way no way no way.

 

Re: possibly being able to do more to help

Posted by alexandra_k on March 5, 2005, at 15:10:03

In reply to Re: possibly being able to do more to help » Dr. Bob, posted by alexandra_k on March 5, 2005, at 15:02:51

Ah, but that being said
AFTER that point
If they continue with 'goodbyes' or equivalent.
Yeah.
I'd do it.
Sure.

If they were serious then they need assistance ASAP
And if they are not then that'll teach 'em not to do that again (hopefully).

 

Re: PS » Dr. Bob

Posted by alexandra_k on March 5, 2005, at 15:12:10

In reply to Re: possibly being able to do more to help, posted by Dr. Bob on March 5, 2005, at 9:28:17

http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20050219/msgs/465833.html

Just in case you missed it...

:-)

 

Re: PS

Posted by just so sad on March 5, 2005, at 16:58:22

In reply to Re: PS » Dr. Bob, posted by alexandra_k on March 5, 2005, at 15:12:10

How about allowing each poster to elect in or out for themselves, indicating whether or not they want other posters to alert you or the ISP if they appear to be suicidal?

 

Re: PS

Posted by Phillipa on March 5, 2005, at 16:59:01

In reply to Re: PS » Dr. Bob, posted by alexandra_k on March 5, 2005, at 15:12:10

I think it deserves some serious thought. Some people [it seems especially young posters] don't really know who they can call,and act out without thinking the consequences through. I maintain some sort of crisis intervention. Maybe a Board that lists what a person can do for help if they are suicidal. For example, Look up a crisis line in your area, even call AA they can link you up, call an ER, your Doctor. Some people when that upset just act. They trust this Board enough to Post here. Okay maybe some are looking for attention, but we are not qualified to make that call. I'd rather be wrong, than sorry. I like your idea Dr. Bob. Fondly, Phillipa

 

Re: immediate concerns

Posted by Dr. Bob on March 5, 2005, at 20:30:35

In reply to Re: PS, posted by Phillipa on March 5, 2005, at 16:59:01

> could there be a separtate email account for this sort of thing that you check?
>
> rainbowbrite

There could be, but sometimes I don't have Internet access at all...

--

> How about allowing each poster to elect in or out for themselves, indicating whether or not they want other posters to alert you or the ISP if they appear to be suicidal?
>
> just so sad

I like the idea of giving people control, but what if someone who opted out were suicidal?

--

> I wouldn't be prepared to deal with the consequences for making a bad call either way. Even the consequences of making a good call.
>
> alexandra_k

I'm not sure what you mean, the consequences of making a good call, what might they be?

--

> Maybe a Board that lists what a person can do for help if they are suicidal.

It's not a board, but there's already Coping With Crisis:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/psycho-babble-tips/links/Coping_with_crisis_001012507973

> I'd rather be wrong, than sorry. I like your idea Dr. Bob.
>
> Phillipa

Thanks, but I think usually people think of it as *safe* rather than sorry. :-)

--

> I'm immediately concerned about the potential for misusing this potential feature.
>
> Lar

> Not to mention the difficulty in assessing the difference between ideation and intent.
>
> I think *I* would find it a bit overwhelming.
>
> Dinah

> Yeah, I agree with Larry that I don't think you want everyone to be able to do that.
>
> alexandra_k

I agree, the potential for misuse and the difficulty of assessing posters are definitely serious issues. Are there ways they could be addressed? For example, what if it took more than one person?

Bob

 

Re: possibly being able to do more to help

Posted by Dinah on March 5, 2005, at 20:31:55

In reply to Re: possibly being able to do more to help » Dr. Bob, posted by alexandra_k on March 5, 2005, at 15:02:51

I just don't understand the anger towards people in such acute distress that they want to kill themselves. While I know it's distressing to watch, I imagine, no I KNOW, it's a whole lot more distressing to experience.

We want Babble to be a community, a family away from family, yet we also want to send the message that if posters are feeling so bad they want to end their life they should go away and do it elsewhere because it makes us uncomfortable? I hope Dr. Bob never follows the example of the other community and implements such a policy.

We've lost at least one Babbler over the years I've been here. And I have to say that it isn't at all preferable for someone to be clearly increasingly distressed and then disappear. Moreover, if even one Babbler is helped through a suicidal crisis by other posters or by intervention here, well, thank God and Dr. Bob.

Babble is a big board. It's perfectly ok for posters not to feel up to coping with a thread like that and to skip it.

I'm sorry if I sound a bit strident. But I remember the message I got as a teen. Nobody cares if you're desperately unhappy. Nobody cares if you feel like killing yourself. But for heavens sake don't make a scene.

 

Re: immediate concerns

Posted by Dinah on March 5, 2005, at 20:37:43

In reply to Re: immediate concerns, posted by Dr. Bob on March 5, 2005, at 20:30:35


> I agree, the potential for misuse and the difficulty of assessing posters are definitely serious issues. Are there ways they could be addressed? For example, what if it took more than one person?
>
> Bob

That would help a lot.

Another thing that might help is very clear guidelines very prominently postes. Something along the lines of "if you express clear suicidal intent, your ISP will likely be contacted, but do not rely on that and please seek help in real life". That way if people get upset that the police came to their door, they can't claim ignorance.

 

Re: immediate concerns

Posted by Phillipa on March 5, 2005, at 20:38:47

In reply to Re: immediate concerns, posted by Dr. Bob on March 5, 2005, at 20:30:35

May be farfetched but how about our own crisis center. I used to have to take crisis calls and refer them when I worked psych. It's hard but rewarding. They have volunteers that work these lines in my area I believe. And you're right Dr. Bob it's safe not sorry. Fondly, Phillipa

 

Re: immediate concerns » Dr. Bob

Posted by Dinah on March 5, 2005, at 20:39:32

In reply to Re: immediate concerns, posted by Dr. Bob on March 5, 2005, at 20:30:35

Is there some person, group of persons, or organization with experience in assessing intent that would be willing to review posts that were sent to their attention?

 

Re: immediate concerns » Phillipa

Posted by Dinah on March 5, 2005, at 20:42:31

In reply to Re: immediate concerns, posted by Phillipa on March 5, 2005, at 20:38:47

That's a great idea, if you could scare up volunteers. That way the people who were doing it would have volunteered for the duty.

 

Re: immediate concerns » Dinah

Posted by Phillipa on March 5, 2005, at 20:42:37

In reply to Re: immediate concerns » Dr. Bob, posted by Dinah on March 5, 2005, at 20:39:32

It would take too long, by then what was intent could be reality. Fondly, Phillipa

 

Re: immediate concerns » Phillipa

Posted by Dinah on March 5, 2005, at 20:44:12

In reply to Re: immediate concerns » Dinah, posted by Phillipa on March 5, 2005, at 20:42:37

It's what Dr. Bob does now. And I trust him more to do it than I would trust untrained posters. I wouldn't want the police showing up at the door too easily.

 

Re: immediate concerns » Dinah

Posted by Phillipa on March 5, 2005, at 20:46:00

In reply to Re: immediate concerns » Phillipa, posted by Dinah on March 5, 2005, at 20:42:31

I'll volunteer. I have an active RN license. I was also Nationally Certified in Psychiatric Nursing. Unfortunately I no longer have it as I haven't worked in 7years. Fondly, Phillipa

 

Re: immediate concerns » Phillipa

Posted by Dinah on March 5, 2005, at 20:51:32

In reply to Re: immediate concerns » Dinah, posted by Phillipa on March 5, 2005, at 20:46:00

That's great. I think it's a good idea if Dr. Bob can get volunteers. I just would hate to see it be something that people felt like it was their responsibility to decide, especially if they had no training. If Dr. Bob gets one or many volunteers, that's a different thing altogether.

But I've got a therapist, ok? I'm in close contact with him. And several people can reach me off board, or even reach my therapist if necessary. Just opting out now. :)

 

Re: possibly being able to do more to help

Posted by alexandra_k on March 5, 2005, at 23:30:08

In reply to Re: possibly being able to do more to help, posted by Dr. Bob on March 5, 2005, at 9:28:17

>Would that be overwhelming?

I think I would prefer not to have it.

>I think *I* would find it a bit overwhelming. Feeling like if I had done something, someone might not have died. Or taking the chance of causing problems in a person's life by pressing the button too easily.

I agree with that.

The consequences of making a good call…
Even if a life is saved as a result I worry that a poster won’t be happy that another poster called the police on them.

But why do people post that kind of stuff on the boards?
I guess it is a plea for help.
I am not angry that some people post that kind of stuff. But I do think it is inappropriate to post that kind of stuff on the boards. That is largely because (currently) when it comes down to it THERE IS NOTHING WE CAN DO. Aside from inform Dr Bob and he can’t be expected to be online 24/7. That is not the message that it is inappropriate to express what one is feeling. Or that it is inappropriate to express suicidal urges. Just the message that it is inappropriate to talk about suicidal urges on the boards (or via babblemail) because THERE IS NOTHING WE CAN DO. There are alternative places to request help from.

But would it be overwhelming to change it so that there is something we can do?

If we have the choice to be able to do this (or have some say in whether it happens)
Then to ‘opt out’ is (to me anyway) the same as doing nothing.
And a consequence is that I would feel partly responsible if they were not okay.
I could have done something and I did not.

So I guess it is up to you…

I don’t think I would find it overwhelming. But I would find it hard. It might seem overwhelming if one found one made a bad call…

On a slightly different note I wonder if letting people do this would escalate or reduce those kinds of posts on the board.

 

Re: immediate concerns

Posted by Phillipa on March 5, 2005, at 23:49:44

In reply to Re: immediate concerns » Dinah, posted by Phillipa on March 5, 2005, at 20:46:00

To work a crisis intervention service on this Board you would have to know all Posters Dx, Their pdoc or doc, past hx of suicide attempts or threats, where they lived, and someone to contact in case of emergency. That's a lot I have to admit. Fondly, Phillipa

 

Re: immediate concerns » Phillipa

Posted by Dinah on March 6, 2005, at 0:37:51

In reply to Re: immediate concerns, posted by Phillipa on March 5, 2005, at 23:49:44

All Dr. Bob does is contact their ISP. Even that is loaded with trouble. People can and do get very angry with him for doing it. But doing it may save someone's life.

That's a heck of a lot of responsibility to bear.

 

Re: immediate concerns » Dinah

Posted by alexandra_k on March 6, 2005, at 1:10:17

In reply to Re: immediate concerns » Phillipa, posted by Dinah on March 6, 2005, at 0:37:51

I agree Dinah, it is.

One I think I would prefer not to have.
But if it becomes an option I would feel obliged to volounteer. Because if I didn't volounteer and I saw someone in distress I would have to live with having volounterily chosen to be powerless in such a situation.

Yuk.

 

Re: immediate concerns

Posted by cubic_me on March 6, 2005, at 5:58:22

In reply to Re: immediate concerns » Dinah, posted by alexandra_k on March 6, 2005, at 1:10:17

I think that if the system of people being able to notify ISP providers was in place, I would hardly talk at all on these boards for fear of the police knocking on my door.

I don't post suicidal intent on these boards, however I can completely understand why people do. Many people have few people IRL who know them as well emotionally or who they trust as much as babblers. It is not true that we can do nothing to help - sometimes words alone can be enough for people to hang on a few more days until things seem bit brighter. Of course we want to stop people killing themselves, but in the end it is THEIR choice, it will not be our fault if they kill themselves. If this system was opperating I think that it may stop people posting who could have truely been helped by some support from babblers.

I don't think that babble has ever explicitly stopped me from attempting suicided (however even recently I can think of one person it has), however it has made me feel less alone at those times. I would not have posted, and therefore felt less alone if I'd have thought that the police may come knocking. I am a very private person, and people knowing about my depression would have severe concequences for me. Also, I ofen post from the university computers - would the police be able to find me there?

I'm sorry for the length of this post, I just feel strongly about this. I think that the idea of some kind of crisis centre is good, but may be impractical (but I don't know). Perhaps more prominant links to the crisis pages would be good, as I didn't even know there were any unitil I read about them on Admin a few weeks ago.

 

Re: immediate concerns » cubic_me

Posted by Dinah on March 6, 2005, at 9:08:16

In reply to Re: immediate concerns, posted by cubic_me on March 6, 2005, at 5:58:22

I agree with everything you say. I would hate for people to lose Babble at the point they most needed it. Perhaps it's a situation where trigger warnings would be a polite gesture. But I don't think it would be right for Dr. Bob to shush people for expressing the ultimate of despair.

I know there are times when people feign suicidal intent, for various reasons. I try to be understanding of the fact that I have no way of knowing if that's true in any particular case, and that whatever reason they have is vital to them. I sometimes fail to keep that in mind.

Oh, this brings back so many old feelings.

Right now, Dr. Bob does contact the ISP if he feels there is an immediate threat, and if he is available. But he's conservative, and he has experience in determining whether a situation calls for that drastic intervention. In fact I contacted him once about a situation that I thought fell into that category, and he disagreed. I trust him in that position.

I'm also not sure it's a burden Dr. Bob should place on the Babble population at large. If he's willing to accept volunteers and give them some rudimentary training, that might be different. Or accept volunteers who already are credentialed in some way.


Go forward in thread:


Show another thread

URL of post in thread:


Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ


[dr. bob] Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD, bob@dr-bob.org

Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.