Psycho-Babble Administration Thread 446891

Shown: posts 11 to 35 of 42. Go back in thread:

 

Re: Custard » NikkiT2

Posted by partlycloudy on January 24, 2005, at 17:07:06

In reply to Custard, posted by NikkiT2 on January 24, 2005, at 16:02:37

It worked brilliantly, though!

 

Re: let's keep it administrative here, thanks (nm)

Posted by Dr. Bob on January 25, 2005, at 4:07:36

In reply to Re: Custard » NikkiT2, posted by partlycloudy on January 24, 2005, at 17:07:06

 

I am protesting (nm) » Dr. Bob

Posted by Atticus on January 25, 2005, at 15:05:39

In reply to Re: let's keep it administrative here, thanks (nm), posted by Dr. Bob on January 25, 2005, at 4:07:36

 

what I personally perceive as (nm) » Atticus

Posted by Atticus on January 25, 2005, at 15:07:33

In reply to I am protesting (nm) » Dr. Bob, posted by Atticus on January 25, 2005, at 15:05:39

 

questionable administrative decisions. (nm) » Atticus

Posted by Atticus on January 25, 2005, at 15:09:12

In reply to what I personally perceive as (nm) » Atticus, posted by Atticus on January 25, 2005, at 15:07:33

 

Re: questionable administrative decisions. » Atticus

Posted by Angel Girl on January 25, 2005, at 16:23:10

In reply to questionable administrative decisions. (nm) » Atticus, posted by Atticus on January 25, 2005, at 15:09:12

Atticus, sweetie, I know you are upset by what happened to me and that you don't feel it was fair. I didn't like it or agree with it either but I do not want to see you get blocked because of me or for any reason. I would miss you on the boards. Call me selfish. lol!!! Please, can you just let it go now. I think Dr. Bob is quite aware of how each of us feels, most of all me, with my endless rants towards him. I think we should move on to better things now. How 'bout it?

AG

 

Re: questionable admin decisions. - Atticus

Posted by Angel Girl on January 25, 2005, at 16:37:15

In reply to Re: questionable administrative decisions. » Atticus, posted by Angel Girl on January 25, 2005, at 16:23:10

> Atticus, sweetie, I know you are upset by what happened to me and that you don't feel it was fair. I didn't like it or agree with it either but I do not want to see you get blocked because of me or for any reason. I would miss you on the boards. Call me selfish. lol!!! Please, can you just let it go now. I think Dr. Bob is quite aware of how each of us feels, most of all me, with my endless rants towards him. I think we should move on to better things now. How 'bout it?
>
> AG


Atticus

Since writing this post I saw your other post where you said that Dr. Bob deleted 3 of your posts. I would like to amend my comments to you in this post.

I would still not be happy for you to get blocked but I myself feel that I can not let it go again so I can hardly ask you to, if this is something that you feel passionate about. PLEASE feel NO obligation to do so on my behalf though. I just would ask you to post as to not get blocked please.

AG

 

Re: let's keep it administrative here, thanks » Dr. Bob

Posted by Fallen4MyT on January 25, 2005, at 17:13:56

In reply to Re: let's keep it administrative here, thanks (nm), posted by Dr. Bob on January 25, 2005, at 4:07:36

Here is another place I do not GET your posts and rules...please keep it on admin...well why did you allow bra jokes above...not that I CARE...I do care about the fact the rules seem to move a lot....Please explain so I can understand this...and thank you

 

Re: I am protesting » Atticus

Posted by Fallen4MyT on January 25, 2005, at 17:17:17

In reply to I am protesting (nm) » Dr. Bob, posted by Atticus on January 25, 2005, at 15:05:39

Atticus...all I do not have my glasses on and may be missing them but I too have posts missing..

WHY would it be so hard to take some things off and not others....
?????? Am I crazy???

 

4 of my posts deleted on Admin; Fallen's too » Fallen4MyT

Posted by Atticus on January 25, 2005, at 18:54:38

In reply to Re: I am protesting » Atticus, posted by Fallen4MyT on January 25, 2005, at 17:17:17

Four posts that I placed on Admin yesterday and today had mysteriously vanished into thin air by this afternoon. I thought the processes on Admin were SUPPOSED to be "transparent," Dr. Bob. But when a message extended over four posts is vaporized, I have to wonder if we've moved into a whole new level of defensive censorship on your part. You didn't even leave xxxxxx's to indicate that you had removed the posts. What's up, boyo? The nips of we lab rats starting to get to you? And now Fallen4myT has just reported missing posts as well. We're not bloody novices unable to work your site. Is this going to be your new strategy when beseiged after making a decision that so many people disagree with? To remove the posts in "1984" revisionist-history fashion? Did you remove the posts? And what was your justification? Atticus

 

Re: 4 of my posts deleted on Admin; Fallen's too » Atticus

Posted by Dinah on January 25, 2005, at 18:56:16

In reply to 4 of my posts deleted on Admin; Fallen's too » Fallen4MyT, posted by Atticus on January 25, 2005, at 18:54:38

Which ones were they?

 

Re: 4 of my posts deleted on Admin; Fallen's too » Dinah

Posted by Fallen4MyT on January 25, 2005, at 19:31:03

In reply to Re: 4 of my posts deleted on Admin; Fallen's too » Atticus, posted by Dinah on January 25, 2005, at 18:56:16

> Which ones were they?


The one's that are missing and may have struck a chord perhaps


THE TRUTH IS OUT THERE SOMEWHERE FOX

Signed
Scully

 

Re: 4 of my posts deleted on Admin; Fallen's too » Dinah

Posted by Atticus on January 25, 2005, at 19:55:58

In reply to Re: 4 of my posts deleted on Admin; Fallen's too » Atticus, posted by Dinah on January 25, 2005, at 18:56:16

Much like the "I am protesting..." posts, they were statements stretched over three posts meant to push the word "*ntichrist" in the poll headers off of the board. This afternoon, the posts just went poof! (Along with a message from Bob to be "administrative." That vanished at the same time.) I looked on Admin, and they were gone without a trace. Only went up yesterday. First time that's ever happened to me on Babble. Interesting that mine were singled out as not being "administrative," while "custard" apparently passed the test. Custard is apparently tres administrative in Bobby's worldview. Atticus

 

I apologise if anyone was offended by my heading (nm)

Posted by alexandra_k on January 25, 2005, at 20:14:12

In reply to Re: 4 of my posts deleted on Admin; Fallen's too » Dinah, posted by Atticus on January 25, 2005, at 19:55:58

 

((((Alexandra))))

Posted by Dinah on January 25, 2005, at 20:18:07

In reply to I apologise if anyone was offended by my heading (nm), posted by alexandra_k on January 25, 2005, at 20:14:12

pinch!!!

 

Um... Ouch? (nm) » Dinah

Posted by alexandra_k on January 25, 2005, at 20:35:09

In reply to ((((Alexandra)))), posted by Dinah on January 25, 2005, at 20:18:07

 

Oops. Thought I'd explained the pinch. » alexandra_k

Posted by Dinah on January 25, 2005, at 20:45:19

In reply to Um... Ouch? (nm) » Dinah, posted by alexandra_k on January 25, 2005, at 20:35:09

It was an old Babble Open custom, instituted in my honor, for what were considered excessive apologies on my part. But it turned into more of an affectionate "No need to apologize, silly." Or at least I thought it did. I hope it did. :O

 

and the dust is stirred once again . . . (nm)

Posted by Angel Girl on January 25, 2005, at 21:10:30

In reply to Um... Ouch? (nm) » Dinah, posted by alexandra_k on January 25, 2005, at 20:35:09

 

? » Angel Girl

Posted by Dinah on January 25, 2005, at 21:13:58

In reply to and the dust is stirred once again . . . (nm), posted by Angel Girl on January 25, 2005, at 21:10:30

Alexandra may have been bewildered by a reference I thought I had explained but hadn't. But I'd be surprised if she found the dust stirred by what she must have known was a kindly meant if enigmatic post.

?

 

Re: Oops. Thought I'd explained the pinch. » Dinah

Posted by alexandra_k on January 25, 2005, at 21:35:15

In reply to Oops. Thought I'd explained the pinch. » alexandra_k, posted by Dinah on January 25, 2005, at 20:45:19

> It was an old Babble Open custom, instituted in my honor, for what were considered excessive apologies on my part. But it turned into more of an affectionate "No need to apologize, silly." Or at least I thought it did. I hope it did. :O

Ah, I hadn't heard that. That makes sense. I don't really think anyone was offended by the subject header. It was one of those 'just incase anybody was' kind of apologies.

I can't access open. Here is why

http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20050116/msgs/447716.html

If anyone has a cunning plan for me I would be grateful.

:-)

 

Re: Oops. Thought I'd explained the pinch. » alexandra_k

Posted by Dinah on January 25, 2005, at 21:42:21

In reply to Re: Oops. Thought I'd explained the pinch. » Dinah, posted by alexandra_k on January 25, 2005, at 21:35:15

Well, I shall endeavor to think of a cunning plan, but I fear it will involve a large turnip in the country.

Java couplet is greek to me.

 

Re: 4 of my posts deleted on Admin; Fallen's too » Fallen4MyT

Posted by rainbowbrite on January 25, 2005, at 21:53:42

In reply to Re: 4 of my posts deleted on Admin; Fallen's too » Dinah, posted by Fallen4MyT on January 25, 2005, at 19:31:03

>The one's that are missing and may have struck a chord perhaps


THE TRUTH IS OUT THERE SOMEWHERE FOX

Signed
Scully

Ok this is hilarious!! how are ya scully?

 

Re: ? » Dinah

Posted by Angel Girl on January 25, 2005, at 22:00:00

In reply to ? » Angel Girl, posted by Dinah on January 25, 2005, at 21:13:58

> Alexandra may have been bewildered by a reference I thought I had explained but hadn't. But I'd be surprised if she found the dust stirred by what she must have known was a kindly meant if enigmatic post.
>
> ?

Sorry Dinah, I was referring to the missing posts. I should've been more explicit. Sorry for the confusion.

AG

 

Thanks for explaining. I'm dense as a post tonite (nm) » Angel Girl

Posted by Dinah on January 25, 2005, at 22:09:32

In reply to Re: ? » Dinah, posted by Angel Girl on January 25, 2005, at 22:00:00

 

Re: bra jokes

Posted by Dr. Bob on January 26, 2005, at 1:13:46

In reply to Re: let's keep it administrative here, thanks » Dr. Bob, posted by Fallen4MyT on January 25, 2005, at 17:13:56

> well why did you allow bra jokes above...

I think they were posted before I got here? Sorry it's confusing!

Bob


Go forward in thread:


Show another thread

URL of post in thread:


Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ


[dr. bob] Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD, bob@dr-bob.org

Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.