Psycho-Babble Administration Thread 446891

Shown: posts 1 to 25 of 42. This is the beginning of the thread.

 

To PBers - Force the nasty word into the archives

Posted by Atticus on January 24, 2005, at 15:26:58

Calling all Babblers:
It appears that Bob has abandoned us here. As those of us who have been here a bit know, there is a way we've found of dealing with things like this in the past, and I'm going to suggest it to all fellow Babblers now: We so clog this page and Admin with post after post that the offending headers will be forced into the archives. The posts can be one word long. It doesn't matter, so long as there are lots of them. Angel Girl obviously has a ton of support here. We don't need to make entreaties to Bob to get rid of those f*cking headers. And this post is hopefully the first of many that will expunge that awful word from view. What say you, Army of Babble? I say to thee, let the mass posting begin in earnest! Atticus the Untamed

 

Okay (nm)

Posted by Gabbix2 on January 24, 2005, at 15:44:04

In reply to To PBers - Force the nasty word into the archives, posted by Atticus on January 24, 2005, at 15:26:58

 

I'll (nm)

Posted by Gabbix2 on January 24, 2005, at 15:44:32

In reply to To PBers - Force the nasty word into the archives, posted by Atticus on January 24, 2005, at 15:26:58

 

try (nm)

Posted by Gabbix2 on January 24, 2005, at 15:44:58

In reply to To PBers - Force the nasty word into the archives, posted by Atticus on January 24, 2005, at 15:26:58

 

ooops wrong board.. :( (nm)

Posted by Gabbix2 on January 24, 2005, at 15:47:29

In reply to try (nm), posted by Gabbix2 on January 24, 2005, at 15:44:58

 

It has been archived.

Posted by alexandra_k on January 24, 2005, at 15:56:02

In reply to To PBers - Force the nasty word into the archives, posted by Atticus on January 24, 2005, at 15:26:58

Unless you are talking about the nasty word on the heading of the poll.

 

Wot (nm)

Posted by NikkiT2 on January 24, 2005, at 16:01:56

In reply to To PBers - Force the nasty word into the archives, posted by Atticus on January 24, 2005, at 15:26:58

 

No (nm)

Posted by NikkiT2 on January 24, 2005, at 16:02:18

In reply to It has been archived., posted by alexandra_k on January 24, 2005, at 15:56:02

 

Custard

Posted by NikkiT2 on January 24, 2005, at 16:02:37

In reply to It has been archived., posted by alexandra_k on January 24, 2005, at 15:56:02

OK, OK, I couldn't think of anything else *L*

 

Re: It has been archived. » alexandra_k

Posted by Atticus on January 24, 2005, at 16:08:03

In reply to It has been archived., posted by alexandra_k on January 24, 2005, at 15:56:02

Well, I'll be damned. I just searched all over PB, looking for spots where it still might exist, and couln't find one of them. Did this happen all at once (Bob intervention), or did the debate just sort of "organically" force the much-loathed headers to the top of the pages and into the archives?
I feel a bit the fool, now, marshalling forces for a battle that's already over. But at least my heart was in the right place, if not my cerebellum. Thanks, Alex! Atticus

 

Re: Custard » NikkiT2

Posted by partlycloudy on January 24, 2005, at 17:07:06

In reply to Custard, posted by NikkiT2 on January 24, 2005, at 16:02:37

It worked brilliantly, though!

 

Re: let's keep it administrative here, thanks (nm)

Posted by Dr. Bob on January 25, 2005, at 4:07:36

In reply to Re: Custard » NikkiT2, posted by partlycloudy on January 24, 2005, at 17:07:06

 

I am protesting (nm) » Dr. Bob

Posted by Atticus on January 25, 2005, at 15:05:39

In reply to Re: let's keep it administrative here, thanks (nm), posted by Dr. Bob on January 25, 2005, at 4:07:36

 

what I personally perceive as (nm) » Atticus

Posted by Atticus on January 25, 2005, at 15:07:33

In reply to I am protesting (nm) » Dr. Bob, posted by Atticus on January 25, 2005, at 15:05:39

 

questionable administrative decisions. (nm) » Atticus

Posted by Atticus on January 25, 2005, at 15:09:12

In reply to what I personally perceive as (nm) » Atticus, posted by Atticus on January 25, 2005, at 15:07:33

 

Re: questionable administrative decisions. » Atticus

Posted by Angel Girl on January 25, 2005, at 16:23:10

In reply to questionable administrative decisions. (nm) » Atticus, posted by Atticus on January 25, 2005, at 15:09:12

Atticus, sweetie, I know you are upset by what happened to me and that you don't feel it was fair. I didn't like it or agree with it either but I do not want to see you get blocked because of me or for any reason. I would miss you on the boards. Call me selfish. lol!!! Please, can you just let it go now. I think Dr. Bob is quite aware of how each of us feels, most of all me, with my endless rants towards him. I think we should move on to better things now. How 'bout it?

AG

 

Re: questionable admin decisions. - Atticus

Posted by Angel Girl on January 25, 2005, at 16:37:15

In reply to Re: questionable administrative decisions. » Atticus, posted by Angel Girl on January 25, 2005, at 16:23:10

> Atticus, sweetie, I know you are upset by what happened to me and that you don't feel it was fair. I didn't like it or agree with it either but I do not want to see you get blocked because of me or for any reason. I would miss you on the boards. Call me selfish. lol!!! Please, can you just let it go now. I think Dr. Bob is quite aware of how each of us feels, most of all me, with my endless rants towards him. I think we should move on to better things now. How 'bout it?
>
> AG


Atticus

Since writing this post I saw your other post where you said that Dr. Bob deleted 3 of your posts. I would like to amend my comments to you in this post.

I would still not be happy for you to get blocked but I myself feel that I can not let it go again so I can hardly ask you to, if this is something that you feel passionate about. PLEASE feel NO obligation to do so on my behalf though. I just would ask you to post as to not get blocked please.

AG

 

Re: let's keep it administrative here, thanks » Dr. Bob

Posted by Fallen4MyT on January 25, 2005, at 17:13:56

In reply to Re: let's keep it administrative here, thanks (nm), posted by Dr. Bob on January 25, 2005, at 4:07:36

Here is another place I do not GET your posts and rules...please keep it on admin...well why did you allow bra jokes above...not that I CARE...I do care about the fact the rules seem to move a lot....Please explain so I can understand this...and thank you

 

Re: I am protesting » Atticus

Posted by Fallen4MyT on January 25, 2005, at 17:17:17

In reply to I am protesting (nm) » Dr. Bob, posted by Atticus on January 25, 2005, at 15:05:39

Atticus...all I do not have my glasses on and may be missing them but I too have posts missing..

WHY would it be so hard to take some things off and not others....
?????? Am I crazy???

 

4 of my posts deleted on Admin; Fallen's too » Fallen4MyT

Posted by Atticus on January 25, 2005, at 18:54:38

In reply to Re: I am protesting » Atticus, posted by Fallen4MyT on January 25, 2005, at 17:17:17

Four posts that I placed on Admin yesterday and today had mysteriously vanished into thin air by this afternoon. I thought the processes on Admin were SUPPOSED to be "transparent," Dr. Bob. But when a message extended over four posts is vaporized, I have to wonder if we've moved into a whole new level of defensive censorship on your part. You didn't even leave xxxxxx's to indicate that you had removed the posts. What's up, boyo? The nips of we lab rats starting to get to you? And now Fallen4myT has just reported missing posts as well. We're not bloody novices unable to work your site. Is this going to be your new strategy when beseiged after making a decision that so many people disagree with? To remove the posts in "1984" revisionist-history fashion? Did you remove the posts? And what was your justification? Atticus

 

Re: 4 of my posts deleted on Admin; Fallen's too » Atticus

Posted by Dinah on January 25, 2005, at 18:56:16

In reply to 4 of my posts deleted on Admin; Fallen's too » Fallen4MyT, posted by Atticus on January 25, 2005, at 18:54:38

Which ones were they?

 

Re: 4 of my posts deleted on Admin; Fallen's too » Dinah

Posted by Fallen4MyT on January 25, 2005, at 19:31:03

In reply to Re: 4 of my posts deleted on Admin; Fallen's too » Atticus, posted by Dinah on January 25, 2005, at 18:56:16

> Which ones were they?


The one's that are missing and may have struck a chord perhaps


THE TRUTH IS OUT THERE SOMEWHERE FOX

Signed
Scully

 

Re: 4 of my posts deleted on Admin; Fallen's too » Dinah

Posted by Atticus on January 25, 2005, at 19:55:58

In reply to Re: 4 of my posts deleted on Admin; Fallen's too » Atticus, posted by Dinah on January 25, 2005, at 18:56:16

Much like the "I am protesting..." posts, they were statements stretched over three posts meant to push the word "*ntichrist" in the poll headers off of the board. This afternoon, the posts just went poof! (Along with a message from Bob to be "administrative." That vanished at the same time.) I looked on Admin, and they were gone without a trace. Only went up yesterday. First time that's ever happened to me on Babble. Interesting that mine were singled out as not being "administrative," while "custard" apparently passed the test. Custard is apparently tres administrative in Bobby's worldview. Atticus

 

I apologise if anyone was offended by my heading (nm)

Posted by alexandra_k on January 25, 2005, at 20:14:12

In reply to Re: 4 of my posts deleted on Admin; Fallen's too » Dinah, posted by Atticus on January 25, 2005, at 19:55:58

 

((((Alexandra))))

Posted by Dinah on January 25, 2005, at 20:18:07

In reply to I apologise if anyone was offended by my heading (nm), posted by alexandra_k on January 25, 2005, at 20:14:12

pinch!!!


Go forward in thread:


Show another thread

URL of post in thread:


Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ


[dr. bob] Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD, bob@dr-bob.org

Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.