![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 1 to 7 of 7. This is the beginning of the thread.
Posted by mcp on January 23, 2005, at 9:48:57
I come back and you are still referring to this epiphany about something being revealed to you, this time in terms of the word. You have repeatedly said what has been revealed to you will help the forum. I am just curious why you haven't if the aforementioned is true and we would all benefit. Instead of constantly referring to it you could just reveal, thereby stomping out any doubters(like myself). I won't bother you again with this and this isn't meant as an insult, just a curiousity. No need to respond with vague or ambiguous statements. I am only interested in what has been revealed to you. Take care
Posted by mair on January 23, 2005, at 13:58:23
In reply to Lou, posted by mcp on January 23, 2005, at 9:48:57
I'm sure Lou would love to elaborate. He used to discuss what had been revealed to him far more frequently and in much more detail, but, as I recall, Bob decided it represented the kind of discussion about beliefs that he (Bob) didn't want on the Board. I think this was right around the time that the Faith Board was established.
I don't venture over there much at all, but from what I've been able to gather, Lou has been pretty vigilant about honoring Bob's rules in this regard. I think if he hadn't been, we'd all be hearing a whole lot more about this on the admin board.
Mair
Posted by Lou Pilder on January 23, 2005, at 17:05:57
In reply to Lou, posted by mcp on January 23, 2005, at 9:48:57
mcp,
You wrote,[curious why you havn't...interested in what has been revealed to you...].
Hummmmmmm
The reason why I havn't is a very long explanation. But if you are interested, I will try to continue on the faith board soon.
Lou
Posted by alexandra_k on January 23, 2005, at 17:55:26
In reply to Lou's reply to mcp-wyhvnt » mcp, posted by Lou Pilder on January 23, 2005, at 17:05:57
Hey if you are worried about whether what you have to say is acceptable to the guidelines of the faith board you could always post it on social and put a link to it on faith...
Posted by Lou Pilder on January 23, 2005, at 18:18:28
In reply to Re: Lou's reply to mcp-wyhvnt » Lou Pilder, posted by alexandra_k on January 23, 2005, at 17:55:26
It has been written here,[...post on social...link to faith...]
Why would thepost be acceptable by doing such?
Lou
Posted by alexandra_k on January 23, 2005, at 18:38:04
In reply to Lou's reply to alexandra_k-postonsoclnktofth, posted by Lou Pilder on January 23, 2005, at 18:18:28
> It has been written here,[...post on social...link to faith...]
> Why would thepost be acceptable by doing such?Ok. Well I thought that there were special rules / guidelines for the acceptability of posts on the faith board. My understanding is that the civility rules on the rest of the boards are a little more relaxed.
For example, I am an athiest. I like to argue for gods inexistence at times. Such discussions are acceptable to the civility guidelines but not acceptable to the faith board guidelines. As such I would post stuff to that effect on social rather than on the faith board.
I thought you might be worried about posting aspects of your revelation on the faith board. They might be ok on social...
Posted by alexandra_k on January 23, 2005, at 18:40:19
In reply to Re: Lou's reply to alexandra_k-postonsoclnktofth » Lou Pilder, posted by alexandra_k on January 23, 2005, at 18:38:04
Oh, whoopsie. I think I should not have posted / suggested that.
I read your post again Mair...
This is the end of the thread.
Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.