![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 1 to 15 of 15. This is the beginning of the thread.
Posted by Lou Pilder on November 1, 2004, at 13:40:38
Dr. Hsiung,
I am requesting that you write what your procedure could be for a poster here to follow if you do not give a determination to a request to you for such.
I feel that if the determination requested is excluded, by not being given, that the {total} facts to consider in a discussion here are missing and this could change the outcome of what the discussion is about.
Also, the determination that was requested, that was not given, could influence how posters post and respond.
Lou Pilder
Posted by gardenergirl on November 1, 2004, at 14:28:25
In reply to Lou's request to Dr. Hsiung, posted by Lou Pilder on November 1, 2004, at 13:40:38
Good question, Lou. Often, though, I think it's more because Dr. Bob might overlook the request.
gg
Posted by Dr. Bob on November 1, 2004, at 15:41:29
In reply to Lou's request to Dr. Hsiung, posted by Lou Pilder on November 1, 2004, at 13:40:38
> I am requesting that you write what your procedure could be for a poster here to follow if you do not give a determination to a request to you for such.
Do you mean if I don't reply at all or if what I determine isn't what the poster thinks I should determine?
Sometimes I don't reply at all because I've already taken some kind of action. It would probably be better to be explicit about that... Also, I don't want to keep going back to the same posts over and over.
Bob
Posted by Lou Pilder on November 1, 2004, at 15:54:53
In reply to Re: Lou's request, posted by Dr. Bob on November 1, 2004, at 15:41:29
Dr. Hsiung,
You wrote,[...you mean if I do not reply at all or if....?].
My request is for you to write a procedure that one can use here to follow if you do not reply at all,and there is no kind of action already taken that the poster knows of, so that a determination of the acceptability or not in relation to the guidlines of the forum could be obtained.
Lou Pilder
Posted by Dr. Bob on November 1, 2004, at 17:36:58
In reply to Lou'sreply to Dr. Hsiung's reply to Lou » Dr. Bob, posted by Lou Pilder on November 1, 2004, at 15:54:53
> My request is for you to write a procedure that one can use here to follow if you do not reply at all,and there is no kind of action already taken that the poster knows of
How about something like:
1. Give me two days.
2. If I still haven't replied, check the original thread.
3. If I haven't taken any action there, remind me about the request.Bob
Posted by Lou Pilder on November 1, 2004, at 17:52:55
In reply to Re: Lou's request, posted by Dr. Bob on November 1, 2004, at 15:41:29
Dr. Hsiung,
There are two cases in regards to my request.
The first case involves a post that I had asked for your determination and you did not reply at all, nor could I find a reply by you to the other poster involved in the request by me to you.
The second case involves my requesting a determination from you about a spacific statement in a post and you did go back to the poster and made a request to the poster to be civil, but the part that you took out of the post in question to comment on was not the part that I spacifically requested for you to make a determination about.
This leads me to think that the part that I had asked for a determination about was left unanswered, for without a determination given by you as to the acceptability or not of the statement that I had spacifically requested for you to make a determination about, I can not be able to determine for myself if your asking the other poster to be civil about another aspect of the post automatically means that the part that I requested a determation about is also uncivil or if that part that I spacifically requested for you to make a determination about is determined to be acceptable because you did not take it out of the post like you did the part that you asked the other poster to be civil about.
I am requesting that you write a determination as to if you write that one part of a post is uncivil, that is not the spacific part that a poster requested the determonation about, if that automatically means that the part that I had spacifically requested for a determination about is also uncivil or if you did not give a determination about that part and it is still unknown as to its acceptability or not in relation to the guidlines of the forum.
Lou Pilder
Posted by Lou Pilder on November 1, 2004, at 18:10:46
In reply to Re: a procedure, posted by Dr. Bob on November 1, 2004, at 17:36:58
Dr. Hsiung,
In response to your invitation to remind you of posts that I had requested a determination about that I could not find a reply from you about, the following two are the ones.
The first one I could not find any reply from you so if there is one, could you give me the URL?
In that post, I had asked if it was acceptable or not in relation to the guidlines of the forum. One poster has already commented about there being sarcasm. The part about [...don't tell me, I was being antisemitic by being upset with my husband because my husband has a jewish great aunt!!!!!!...], is the spacific part that I am requesting that you make a determination as to it being acceptable or not in relation to the guidlines of the forum.
http;//www.dr.bob.org/babble/admin/20041012/msgs/403873.html
The second post is the one that my spacific request was not answered, or at least I can not find an answer to that part about. I spacifically requested a determination about is the statement that starts out,[...I believe you are evil...
Below is the link to the post in question that I sent to you for a determination and the link to the spacific post by the poster is there.
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20041012/msgs/404334.html
Lou PIlder
Posted by Lou Pilder on November 1, 2004, at 21:16:20
In reply to Lou's reminder to DR. Hsiung » Dr. Bob, posted by Lou Pilder on November 1, 2004, at 18:10:46
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20041012/msgs/403873.html
The above is the corrected link about my request to you for a determination in regards to the acceptability or not of the mentioned statement by the poster in question in relation to the guidlines of the forum.
Lou Pilder
Posted by Dr. Bob on November 2, 2004, at 17:14:42
In reply to corrected link, posted by Lou Pilder on November 1, 2004, at 21:16:20
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20041012/msgs/403873.html
> The above is the corrected link about my request to you for a determination in regards to the acceptability or not of the mentioned statement by the poster in question in relation to the guidlines of the forum.Sorry, that's a post by Nikki. Is there a request from you that I didn't reply to?
Bob
Posted by Lou Pilder on November 2, 2004, at 17:22:29
In reply to Re: corrected link, posted by Dr. Bob on November 2, 2004, at 17:14:42
Dr. Hsiung,
The corrected link of my request to you is:
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20041012/msgs/403973.html
Lou pilder
Posted by Dr. Bob on November 2, 2004, at 19:12:14
In reply to corrected link for Lou's request To Dr. Hsiung » Dr. Bob, posted by Lou Pilder on November 2, 2004, at 17:22:29
Posted by Lou Pilder on November 3, 2004, at 12:42:20
In reply to Re: thanks, I replied there (nm), posted by Dr. Bob on November 2, 2004, at 19:12:14
Dr. Hsiung,
I have had your response to my request reviewd because it is hard to follow the links that you have offered and I have reviewd it and find the following:
I had requested that you write a determination as to the acceptability or not in relation to the guidlines of the forum for spacific statements posted to me. You replied, [...thanks, I replied there...] to the link to the post that I had requested to you for the determination. I went {there} and found that you wrote,[...I did ask her to be civil later in that thread...].
I then went to a post from you in that thread that wrote,[...please do not post to some one if they've asked you not to...].
That statement only addresses the part of the post that has to do with the [..please do not post to me rule...] and does not address, as I see it, as to if the statement by the poster that I had requested that you make a determination as to the acceptability or not in relation to the guidlines of the forum is acceptable to be posted on the forum or if it is not acceptable in relation to the guidlines of the forum.
Since I do not see a reply from you that spacifically answers my request to you to give a determination as to if the statement in question by me to you for determination is acceptable or not, I feel very bad, but if I have missed any reply by you that spacifically writes that the part in question is either acceptable for the forum or not acceptable, could you post the URL to such and I will be able then to see that there is an answer by you that does write that it is or is not acceptable?
Lou Pilder
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20041027/msgs/410812.html
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20041027/msgs/410811.html
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20041012/msgs/404346.html
Posted by Lou Pilder on November 3, 2004, at 14:32:46
In reply to Re: thanks, I replied there (nm), posted by Dr. Bob on November 2, 2004, at 19:12:14
Dr. Hsiung,
In your reply to me, you wrote, [...I replied there...]
In reviewing your reply to me, there were two posts in question. I had responded to your invitation to remind you of posts. I posted to you the following in the same thread of this discussion. In the post that is in the link on this post, there is another link that is incorrect and then the second link is correct so that clicking on it brings up the spacific statement that I had requested to you to give a determination as to the acceptability or not in relation to the guidlines of the forum. I have not been able to find any post by you that gives the determination to me by you that I requested. If I have missed it, could you give me the URL for it?
http:www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20041027/msgs/410280.html
Lou Pilder
Posted by Lou Pilder on November 3, 2004, at 14:37:17
In reply to Lou's reply to Dr. Hsiung » Dr. Bob, posted by Lou Pilder on November 3, 2004, at 14:32:46
> Dr. Hsiung,
> In your reply to me, you wrote, [...I replied there...]
> In reviewing your reply to me, there were two posts in question. I had responded to your invitation to remind you of posts. I posted to you the following in the same thread of this discussion. In the post that is in the link on this post, there is another link that is incorrect and then the second link is correct so that clicking on it brings up the spacific statement that I had requested to you to give a determination as to the acceptability or not in relation to the guidlines of the forum. I have not been able to find any post by you that gives the determination to me by you that I requested. If I have missed it, could you give me the URL for it?
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20041027/msgs/410280.html
> Lou Pilder
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20041027/msgs/410280.html
Posted by Dr. Bob on November 4, 2004, at 10:18:31
In reply to Lou's reply to Dr. Hsiung » Dr. Bob, posted by Lou Pilder on November 3, 2004, at 12:42:20
> That statement only addresses ... part of the post
I'm sorry you feel bad, but if addressing part of a post, or one of a number of posts, is enough to decide what to do, then I may leave it at that.
Bob
This is the end of the thread.
Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.