Psycho-Babble Administration Thread 407518

Shown: posts 1 to 4 of 4. This is the beginning of the thread.

 

How about a 'no more than 2 consec. posts' rule?

Posted by Shar on October 26, 2004, at 15:07:46

?

 

Re: How about a 'no more than 2 consec. posts' rule?

Posted by SLS on October 26, 2004, at 15:09:56

In reply to How about a 'no more than 2 consec. posts' rule?, posted by Shar on October 26, 2004, at 15:07:46

> ?

Hi Shar.

Any particular reason?

BTW, how have you been?

:-)


- Scott

 

How about a 'no more than 2 consec. posts' rul » SLS

Posted by Shar on October 26, 2004, at 15:34:10

In reply to Re: How about a 'no more than 2 consec. posts' rule?, posted by SLS on October 26, 2004, at 15:09:56

SLS,
Just seemed like a good idea.

I'm doing pretty awful. Adding whopping, day long panic attacks to my unremitting depression.

Hope you are well!

Shar

 

Re: How about a 'no more than 2 consec. posts' rul » Shar

Posted by Shar on October 26, 2004, at 21:25:20

In reply to How about a 'no more than 2 consec. posts' rul » SLS, posted by Shar on October 26, 2004, at 15:34:10

just thinking to myself........
or...we could cut some threads by a third (if my math is correct). Which might not be a bad thing.

Shar


This is the end of the thread.


Show another thread

URL of post in thread:


Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ


[dr. bob] Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD, bob@dr-bob.org

Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.