Shown: posts 1 to 11 of 11. This is the beginning of the thread.
Posted by Lou Pilder on October 17, 2004, at 20:48:00
Dr. Hsiung,
I am requesting that you make a determination as to the acceptability or not of the following in relation to the guidlines of the forum.
Lou Pilder
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/social/20041016/msgs/404263.html
Posted by Toph on October 17, 2004, at 21:00:52
In reply to Lou's request to Dr. Hsiung, posted by Lou Pilder on October 17, 2004, at 20:48:00
Get a grip Lou. Jay may just be a master at baiting others into a frenzy.
Posted by Lou Pilder on October 17, 2004, at 21:06:47
In reply to Re: Lou's request to Dr. Hsiung » Lou Pilder, posted by Toph on October 17, 2004, at 21:00:52
Toph,
please do not post to me.
Lou
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20041012/msgs/404272.html
Posted by Toph on October 18, 2004, at 6:34:43
In reply to Re: Lou's request to Dr. Hsiung » Lou Pilder, posted by Toph on October 17, 2004, at 21:00:52
> Get a grip Lou. Jay may just be a master at baiting others into a frenzy.
NP. I'm sure you'll be able to take on all comers by yourself.
Posted by Dr. Bob on October 19, 2004, at 3:13:20
In reply to Re: Lou's request » Toph, posted by Toph on October 18, 2004, at 6:34:43
> NP...
Please don't post to someone if they've asked you not to. Thanks,
Bob
Posted by Toph on October 19, 2004, at 10:15:47
In reply to Re: please be civil » Toph, posted by Dr. Bob on October 19, 2004, at 3:13:20
> > NP...
>
> Please don't post to someone if they've asked you not to. Thanks,
>
> BobShouldn't you say, "don't post about someone" since I replied to my own post not Mr. Pilder's? OK, I admit my intent was to make one more lame masturbation reference, but I didn't actually post to him, technically.
Posted by Dr. Bob on October 20, 2004, at 1:40:54
In reply to Re: civil » Dr. Bob, posted by Toph on October 19, 2004, at 10:15:47
> I didn't actually post to him
You're right, I misread that, sorry!
Bob
Posted by Fi on October 21, 2004, at 15:23:53
In reply to Re: please be civil » Toph, posted by Dr. Bob on October 19, 2004, at 3:13:20
I've just realised that I dont know if there is a already a time limit on how long you should not post someone who asked you not to post to them.
If there isnt a stated limit already, I dont mean we need a new 'rule' as such, but would be interesting to know what other people think. What is appropriate/respectful? Is it for ever? A couple of weeks? Or a month? 6 months? Or does it depend on circumstances?...
Fi
> > NP...
>
> Please don't post to someone if they've asked you not to. Thanks,
>
> Bob
Posted by Larry Hoover on October 21, 2004, at 22:34:37
In reply to Re: limit to not posting someone?, posted by Fi on October 21, 2004, at 15:23:53
> I've just realised that I dont know if there is a already a time limit on how long you should not post someone who asked you not to post to them.
>
> If there isnt a stated limit already, I dont mean we need a new 'rule' as such, but would be interesting to know what other people think. What is appropriate/respectful? Is it for ever? A couple of weeks? Or a month? 6 months? Or does it depend on circumstances?...
>
> FiThe prohibition exists as until it is rescinded. There is no time limit, although Bob generally encourages people to reconsider after some time has passed. Posting directly to someone who is in receipt of a do not post request automatically cancels the prohibition against posting.
Lar
Posted by Fi on October 22, 2004, at 15:34:22
In reply to Re: limit to not posting someone? » Fi, posted by Larry Hoover on October 21, 2004, at 22:34:37
Posted by Dr. Bob on October 23, 2004, at 4:03:37
In reply to Re: limit to not posting someone? » Fi, posted by Larry Hoover on October 21, 2004, at 22:34:37
This is the end of the thread.
Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD, bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.