![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 1 to 7 of 7. This is the beginning of the thread.
Posted by Lou Pilder on September 26, 2004, at 17:28:18
Dr. Hsiung,
I am requesting that you make a determination as to if the following is acceptable or not.
The poster writes,
[...the board should not be hijacked and monopolized by one individual out of fairness to others...]
Lou Pilder
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20040902/msgs/395393.html
Posted by Lou Pilder on September 26, 2004, at 17:36:04
In reply to Lou's request for a determination, posted by Lou Pilder on September 26, 2004, at 17:28:18
Dr. Hsiung,
In what the poster wrote in the previous post,I feel that the use of the word {hijacked} is an inappropriate word in the context of the discussion that it is in.
Hijacking is a crime, and I do not feel that anyone should be associated with a criminal act for posting here.
Lou Pilder
http://www.dr.bob.org/babble/admin/20040902/msgs/395393.html
Posted by Lou Pilder on September 26, 2004, at 17:44:52
In reply to Lou's request for a determination-kr-hj-mono-2, posted by Lou Pilder on September 26, 2004, at 17:36:04
Dr. Hsiung,
In the post in question, the poster writes,[...board....{monopolized} by one individual...]
I feel that the word monopolized has some potential to put down or accuse someone that posts here a lot. First, that poster, even if the at poster writes 10 posts, does not monopolize the board for posters are free to also write.
Lou Pilder
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20040902/msgs/395393.html
Posted by Lou Pilder on September 26, 2004, at 17:52:16
In reply to Lou's request for a determination-kr-hj-mono-3, posted by Lou Pilder on September 26, 2004, at 17:44:52
Dr. Hsiung.
another aspect of that post that I am asking you to make a determination as to its acceptability is that the poster writes,[...not posts that are {endless}...].
I feel that the use of {endless} here in the context of the discussion has the potential to be an exaggeration,or a potential to be sarcastic, for how could a number of posts be {endless}?
Lou Pilder
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20040902/msgs/395393.html
Posted by Lou Pilder on September 26, 2004, at 17:58:10
In reply to Lou's request for a determination-kr-hj-mono-4, posted by Lou Pilder on September 26, 2004, at 17:52:16
Dr. Hsiung,
Then the poster writes,[...I would like to see no more than 5 posts that ...].
I am asking you to make a determination as to if you feel that for anyone's speech to be restricted here on the basis of how many posts the poster needs to use to express themselves has the potential to be unsupportive.
Lou Pilder
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20040902/msgs/395393.html
Posted by justyourlaugh on September 26, 2004, at 18:29:01
In reply to Lou's request for a determination, posted by Lou Pilder on September 26, 2004, at 17:28:18
i see that you expressed your point perfectly in your first post..
i understood your concerns..
i did not have to read post 2
3
4
5
trust that we are listening..
j
Posted by Dr. Bob on September 27, 2004, at 10:34:48
In reply to Lou's request for a determination, posted by Lou Pilder on September 26, 2004, at 17:28:18
> The poster writes,
> [...the board should not be hijacked and monopolized by one individual out of fairness to others...]Sorry to interrupt, but to consolidate the discussion, I'd like to redirect this thread to an earlier one:
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20040927/msgs/395699.html
Thanks,
Bob
This is the end of the thread.
Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.