Shown: posts 1 to 9 of 9. This is the beginning of the thread.
Posted by Dr. Bob on September 6, 2004, at 23:44:26
In reply to I'm not sure, posted by Dinah on September 6, 2004, at 21:58:22
> I had thought it was number of posts, but someone just let me know that the FAQ says it's a function of file size.
>
> So I think we need loooong posts.
>
> Still, I would think this *should* have done it.It's a function of the size of the main page, which is mostly a function of the number of posts. The message parts aren't stored there. Also, the server checks only once each day (at 4 am) rather than continuously.
Social is over its limit now, so it should be archived at 4 am tomorrow. Congratulations! :-)
Bob
Posted by Dinah on September 6, 2004, at 23:54:32
In reply to Re: when boards are archived, posted by Dr. Bob on September 6, 2004, at 23:44:26
I knew we could.
And thanks for the explanation, Dr. Bob. I don't suppose you know approximately how many posts it takes, just in case the situation arises again.
Posted by gardenergirl on September 7, 2004, at 0:31:33
In reply to Re: Hooray! We did it! » Dr. Bob, posted by Dinah on September 6, 2004, at 23:54:32
Woo hoo! Almost worth staying up to see it turn over...oh wait, that's the insomnia talking.
Great job, Dinah, shadows, and everyone who posted.
Thanks Dr. Bob, for 'splaining.
gg
Posted by Dinah on September 7, 2004, at 3:13:56
In reply to Re: Hooray! We did it! » Dinah, posted by gardenergirl on September 7, 2004, at 0:31:33
I'm not too far from being up to see the archive. Darned job. Or darn me for underestimating the time involved - again. If I'm still up in half an hour, I'll come and refresh and see the magic moment.
And then maybe post a big disclaimer on Social for those who don't read Admin. I'll bet plenty of people are quietly thinking "manic?".
Posted by SAW on September 7, 2004, at 5:04:04
In reply to Re: Hooray! We did it! » gardenergirl, posted by Dinah on September 7, 2004, at 3:13:56
Posted by Larry Hoover on September 7, 2004, at 8:37:02
In reply to Re: Hooray! We did it! » Dr. Bob, posted by Dinah on September 6, 2004, at 23:54:32
> I knew we could.
>
> And thanks for the explanation, Dr. Bob. I don't suppose you know approximately how many posts it takes, just in case the situation arises again.I checked that. It's over 600, sometimes substantially more.
Lar
Posted by Dinah on September 7, 2004, at 8:38:35
In reply to Re: Hooray! We did it! » Dinah, posted by Larry Hoover on September 7, 2004, at 8:37:02
Geez, Louise.
I hope no one decides to have a bit of fun re-raising the subject heading. Even I'd have trouble posting *that* much.
Posted by gardenergirl on September 7, 2004, at 8:46:10
In reply to Re: Hooray! We did it! » gardenergirl, posted by Dinah on September 7, 2004, at 3:13:56
LOL, If I remember correctly, a couple people asked me that when I did this at another site. Not manic, just smart, determined, and kind.
gg
Posted by Shadowplayers721 on September 9, 2004, at 2:25:12
In reply to Re: Hooray! We did it! » Dinah, posted by gardenergirl on September 7, 2004, at 8:46:10
I saw some of those vulgar posts on their for days, but my lengthy post about decor got swipped off in a matter in a lot less time. Isn't that odd? I thing something is weird. I realize that my post was long. Oh, what's the point in any explaining. sigh Maybe someone didn't like my name showing up so many times or I give up. Oh, well, so much for this..... ugh
Maybe, I was looking forward to seeing some positive posts back. Maybe, I am losing time again.
This is the end of the thread.
Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD, bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.