![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 1 to 7 of 7. This is the beginning of the thread.
Posted by Lou pilder on September 4, 2004, at 7:58:49
Dr. Hsiung,
Could you clarify what allows the poster to wtrite without admonishment the statement:
[...He,(god) says that {Jesus is the only way to Him.} No other way is given by God except through the salvation offered by Jesus...].
If I was to know why you are allowing that post without admonishment when sin\milar posts are admonished,, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly
Lou Pilder
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faith/20040729/msgs/385777.html
Posted by Dinah on September 4, 2004, at 10:58:28
In reply to Lou's rerquest for clarification, posted by Lou pilder on September 4, 2004, at 7:58:49
Posted by Lou Pilder on September 4, 2004, at 11:21:09
In reply to Re: Hello Lou. Welcome back. (nm) » Lou pilder, posted by Dinah on September 4, 2004, at 10:58:28
Posted by bobby on September 4, 2004, at 19:31:41
In reply to Lou's rerquest for clarification, posted by Lou pilder on September 4, 2004, at 7:58:49
Posted by Lou Pilder on September 4, 2004, at 19:42:05
In reply to Hi Lou--long time no see (nm) » Lou pilder, posted by bobby on September 4, 2004, at 19:31:41
bobby,
It is good to hear from you.
Lou
Posted by Lou PIlder on November 22, 2012, at 13:41:33
In reply to Lou's rerquest for clarification, posted by Lou pilder on September 4, 2004, at 7:58:49
> Dr. Hsiung,
> Could you clarify what allows the poster to wtrite without admonishment the statement:
> [...He,(god) says that {Jesus is the only way to Him.} No other way is given by God except through the salvation offered by Jesus...].
> If I was to know why you are allowing that post without admonishment when similar posts are admonished,, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly
> Lou Pilder
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faith/20040729/msgs/385777.htmlMr. Hsiung,
In regards to your policy to keep reminding you, the above.
Now I consider the allowing of statements of the nature here to have the potential to arouse antisemitic feelings in particular when there is a rule that covers such statements. And more than that, I am under your prohibition to me that prevents me from posting the foundation of Judaism as revealed to me so that I can not post the response to the statement as I would need to defend Jewery and Islam and other faihs that the statement insults, for Judaism and Islam and other faiths teach theri children that they can reach God and have salvation by another way in their own faith. I do not see that the statement can be seen differently by Jews and others if the member places the preface{I Believe or my church members believe or my group teaches such etc.}. I would like to know if you consider the statement in question supportive here if a modification was made to the statement, although I do not see one. Is there one?
Lou Pilder
Posted by Lou PIlder on June 5, 2013, at 6:15:32
In reply to Lou's rerquest for clarification-reminder-psuhpor?, posted by Lou PIlder on November 22, 2012, at 13:41:33
> > Dr. Hsiung,
> > Could you clarify what allows the poster to wtrite without admonishment the statement:
> > [...He,(god) says that {Jesus is the only way to Him.} No other way is given by God except through the salvation offered by Jesus...].
> > If I was to know why you are allowing that post without admonishment when similar posts are admonished,, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly
> > Lou Pilder
> > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faith/20040729/msgs/385777.html
>
> Mr. Hsiung,
> In regards to your policy to keep reminding you, the above.
> Now I consider the allowing of statements of the nature here to have the potential to arouse antisemitic feelings in particular when there is a rule that covers such statements. And more than that, I am under your prohibition to me that prevents me from posting the foundation of Judaism as revealed to me so that I can not post the response to the statement as I would need to defend Jewery and Islam and other faihs that the statement insults, for Judaism and Islam and other faiths teach theri children that they can reach God and have salvation by another way in their own faith. I do not see that the statement can be seen differently by Jews and others if the member places the preface{I Believe or my church members believe or my group teaches such etc.}. I would like to know if you consider the statement in question supportive here if a modification was made to the statement, although I do not see one. Is there one?
> Lou Pilder
>
> Mr Hsiung,
In regards to yuour policy to remind you and keep reminding you, the above.
Lou Pilder
>
This is the end of the thread.
Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.