Shown: posts 1 to 4 of 4. This is the beginning of the thread.
Posted by Phillipa on December 27, 2013, at 11:16:29
Seems a while ago almost no one questioned the use of antidressants for depression and even anxiety. Why take an antidepressant when there are meds specifically for anxiety, OCD, and now we find out that those that the medical profession claimed to be addictive or we very hard to get off are now being found to be both safer, target the problem and don't have the withdrawal effects of antidepressants. Seems we have gone full circle yet again. Since antibiotics are now resistant to bacteria from overuse. Do you feel that the same is true for the few that ad's do help. Take more need more than none work? Like a MRSA of the brain? Phillipa
Posted by poser938 on December 27, 2013, at 16:48:50
In reply to The Questioning of Antidepressants, posted by Phillipa on December 27, 2013, at 11:16:29
For Xanax and Adderall they call it addiction.
For Paxil and Cymbalta they call it "withdrawal syndrome"
Posted by SLS on December 27, 2013, at 17:22:01
In reply to Re: The Questioning of Antidepressants, posted by poser938 on December 27, 2013, at 16:48:50
> For Xanax and Adderall they call it addiction.
> For Paxil and Cymbalta they call it "withdrawal syndrome"In addition to a physiological dependence, I believe addiction includes cravings along with a psychological dependence.
- Scott
Posted by Phillipa on December 27, 2013, at 20:52:53
In reply to Re: The Questioning of Antidepressants » poser938, posted by SLS on December 27, 2013, at 17:22:01
That is so true. No cravings here. Just find it harder to get off ad's
This is the end of the thread.
Psycho-Babble Medication | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.