![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 1 to 7 of 7. This is the beginning of the thread.
Posted by Lurker on June 1, 2000, at 21:35:08
Yes, I've read the published reports about it but still have to ask 'real people' about it. How long does it REALLY take to start working? What DON'T the docs tell ya?
Posted by JohnL on June 2, 2000, at 4:36:02
In reply to Moclobemide/Manerix???????, posted by Lurker on June 1, 2000, at 21:35:08
> Yes, I've read the published reports about it but still have to ask 'real people' about it. How long does it REALLY take to start working? What DON'T the docs tell ya?
During the last year or so we've seen a few people with real life experiences with Moclobemide, me being one of them. I do recall several people who responded well to it, though I don't recall the time frame for the drug to kick in.
With me and a few others here, Manerix actually caused worsened depression with agitation that wasn't there before. These negative effects were noticed on the very first day and did not go away in several weeks of enduring the trials. So if you try it and have negative effects quickly, there's a real good chance it's not the right drug for your chemistry. On the other hand, if it's neutral or good at the start, then it will be worth giving a longer trial to see how it goes.
In literature I noticed that Manerix is often most effective at doses above the stated maximum dose. But of course, if we can't tolerate low doses, there's no way we'll ever be able to get to the higher ones.
What DON'T the docs tell ya? Well, I don't recall them ever telling me I might get worse instead of better. And I don't recall them telling me I might experience severe anorgasmia/numbing of sexual function. Moclobemide supposedly has few, if any, sexual side effects. Not so with me.
As with all meds, your mileage may vary. There's no way to tell without a personal trial, unfortunately. If you decide to try it though, I would be very interested if you could keep us up to date on how it goes.
JohnL
Posted by Lurker on June 2, 2000, at 8:55:30
In reply to Re: Moclobemide/Manerix???????, posted by JohnL on June 2, 2000, at 4:36:02
John, I'm starting it next week and will keep you informed, no problem. Thanks for the input though. I'll watch for the worsening symptoms. Have a good one bud--Lurker
> > Yes, I've read the published reports about it but still have to ask 'real people' about it. How long does it REALLY take to start working? What DON'T the docs tell ya?
>
> During the last year or so we've seen a few people with real life experiences with Moclobemide, me being one of them. I do recall several people who responded well to it, though I don't recall the time frame for the drug to kick in.
>
> With me and a few others here, Manerix actually caused worsened depression with agitation that wasn't there before. These negative effects were noticed on the very first day and did not go away in several weeks of enduring the trials. So if you try it and have negative effects quickly, there's a real good chance it's not the right drug for your chemistry. On the other hand, if it's neutral or good at the start, then it will be worth giving a longer trial to see how it goes.
>
> In literature I noticed that Manerix is often most effective at doses above the stated maximum dose. But of course, if we can't tolerate low doses, there's no way we'll ever be able to get to the higher ones.
>
> What DON'T the docs tell ya? Well, I don't recall them ever telling me I might get worse instead of better. And I don't recall them telling me I might experience severe anorgasmia/numbing of sexual function. Moclobemide supposedly has few, if any, sexual side effects. Not so with me.
>
> As with all meds, your mileage may vary. There's no way to tell without a personal trial, unfortunately. If you decide to try it though, I would be very interested if you could keep us up to date on how it goes.
> JohnL
Posted by Carol on June 2, 2000, at 11:17:41
In reply to Re: Moclobemide/Manerix???????, posted by Lurker on June 2, 2000, at 8:55:30
I was on Manerix for a year and a half after several years of being on Prozac. I thought Manerix was wonderful with no side effects. I did however have to go up to quite a high dose in the end. I was taking 1200 mgm per day. After a physical illness which was complicated my depression became worse and I had to try some new drugs. I am now on Manerix 600mgm/day plus Wellbutrin,Topamax,Clonazepam,Dexedrine and neurontin for post shingles pain. Since starting the Topamax I feel as though I can see the light at the end of the tunnel. When I first started the Manerix in 1998 it seemed to take effect very quickly.
Posted by MH on August 12, 2000, at 8:39:17
In reply to Re: Moclobemide/Manerix???????, posted by Lurker on June 2, 2000, at 8:55:30
> John, I'm starting it next week and will keep you informed, no problem. Thanks for the input though. I'll watch for the worsening symptoms. Have a good one bud--Lurker
>
> > > Yes, I've read the published reports about it but still have to ask 'real people' about it. How long does it REALLY take to start working? What DON'T the docs tell ya?
> >
> > During the last year or so we've seen a few people with real life experiences with Moclobemide, me being one of them. I do recall several people who responded well to it, though I don't recall the time frame for the drug to kick in.
> >
> > With me and a few others here, Manerix actually caused worsened depression with agitation that wasn't there before. These negative effects were noticed on the very first day and did not go away in several weeks of enduring the trials. So if you try it and have negative effects quickly, there's a real good chance it's not the right drug for your chemistry. On the other hand, if it's neutral or good at the start, then it will be worth giving a longer trial to see how it goes.
> >
> > In literature I noticed that Manerix is often most effective at doses above the stated maximum dose. But of course, if we can't tolerate low doses, there's no way we'll ever be able to get to the higher ones.
> >
> > What DON'T the docs tell ya? Well, I don't recall them ever telling me I might get worse instead of better. And I don't recall them telling me I might experience severe anorgasmia/numbing of sexual function. Moclobemide supposedly has few, if any, sexual side effects. Not so with me.
> >
> > As with all meds, your mileage may vary. There's no way to tell without a personal trial, unfortunately. If you decide to try it though, I would be very interested if you could keep us up to date on how it goes.
> > JohnLHave used Aurorix (Aust)/Manerix for approx one month with nil side affects (SSRIs intolerable for me) - started to show great results until my Dr went way for a short while, ran out of script - now he's back, will start again next week and will keep you posted.
Posted by Cam W. on August 12, 2000, at 12:03:35
In reply to Re: Moclobemide/Manerix???????, posted by MH on August 12, 2000, at 8:39:17
MH - I don't know about pharmacy laws in Australia, but here in Canada, pharmacists are allowed to give a patient enough of a continuing med until their doctor returns without a prescription. It's a pain in the butt to have to start over again.
My 2¢ - Cam
Posted by MH on August 15, 2000, at 5:38:04
In reply to Re: Moclobemide/Manerix??????? » MH, posted by Cam W. on August 12, 2000, at 12:03:35
> MH - I don't know about pharmacy laws in Australia, but here in Canada, pharmacists are allowed to give a patient enough of a continuing med until their doctor returns without a prescription. It's a pain in the butt to have to start over again.
>
> My 2¢ - CamThanks Cam - yes it is a bit similar here. We had a communication breakdown at the time and wasn't sure if he wanted me back on them again...all clear now (I hope)...
Chrs
MH
This is the end of the thread.
Psycho-Babble Medication | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.