![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 56 to 80 of 105. Go back in thread:
Posted by Gabbix2 on January 14, 2005, at 17:42:29
In reply to Lou's reply to Gabbix2-clarfymenig » Gabbix2, posted by Lou Pilder on January 14, 2005, at 17:22:41
> Gabbix 2,
> You wrote about the word,"antichrist". Could you clarify what the word 's meaning is? I am not sure of the word's meaning.
> LouI'm not an expert, but I believe the anti-Christ is considered to be the embodiment of evil, and the opposite of truth. Some biblical interpretations say it will be a person, others say beast, who will appear near the end of time and convince people it is the actual Christ when it is the opposite, and spurred on by Satan.
Posted by Gabbix2 on January 14, 2005, at 17:43:55
In reply to subject line woes » Angel Girl, posted by gardenergirl on January 14, 2005, at 17:36:33
Posted by Gabbix2 on January 14, 2005, at 17:44:39
In reply to subject line woes » Angel Girl, posted by gardenergirl on January 14, 2005, at 17:36:33
Posted by Gabbix2 on January 14, 2005, at 17:45:21
In reply to subject line woes » Angel Girl, posted by gardenergirl on January 14, 2005, at 17:36:33
Posted by Lou Pilder on January 14, 2005, at 17:51:18
In reply to Certainly ,Lou, posted by Gabbix2 on January 14, 2005, at 17:42:29
Gabbix2,
You wrote,[...some say the antichrist will be a person ...some say a beast...appearing near the end of time...].
Are there any things that you know that preceed the advent of this person or beast?
Lou
Posted by Fallen4MyT on January 14, 2005, at 17:54:28
In reply to Lou's resp[onse to Angel Girl's post-beachrstntose » Angel Girl, posted by Lou Pilder on January 14, 2005, at 13:43:13
Lou I am shocked by this as you have always been imo a civil poster but in this case I feel you have been very offensive to Angel Girl and YOU owe her an apology.
> AG,
> You wrote,[...I guess ...you have to be a christian to see the significance of the word...].
> I am not a member of christiandom so I do not see the significance that you see. Can I consider that you are apologising to me by writing that?
> Lou
>
Posted by gardenergirl on January 14, 2005, at 18:12:28
In reply to Re: subject line woes Idea (nm) » gardenergirl, posted by Gabbix2 on January 14, 2005, at 17:45:21
Posted by Gabbix2 on January 14, 2005, at 18:12:38
In reply to Lou's reply to Gabbix2-nerthend » Gabbix2, posted by Lou Pilder on January 14, 2005, at 17:51:18
> Gabbix2,
> You wrote,[...some say the antichrist will be a person ...some say a beast...appearing near the end of time...].
> Are there any things that you know that preceed the advent of this person or beast?
> LouNot that I know off hand Lou sorry, I'm afraid I've forgotten most of my Catholic School studies. I think it's in revelations though, in the bible
I do know you owe Angel Girl an apology though : )
Posted by gardenergirl on January 14, 2005, at 18:12:54
In reply to Thanks (nm) » Gabbix2, posted by gardenergirl on January 14, 2005, at 18:12:28
Posted by gardenergirl on January 14, 2005, at 18:13:11
In reply to It was (nm), posted by gardenergirl on January 14, 2005, at 18:12:54
Posted by gardenergirl on January 14, 2005, at 18:13:59
In reply to Dinah's (nm), posted by gardenergirl on January 14, 2005, at 18:13:11
Posted by Gabbix2 on January 14, 2005, at 18:19:33
In reply to idea (nm), posted by gardenergirl on January 14, 2005, at 18:13:59
Posted by Gabbix2 on January 14, 2005, at 18:20:58
In reply to She's (nm), posted by Gabbix2 on January 14, 2005, at 18:19:33
Posted by coral on January 14, 2005, at 19:48:19
In reply to awesome (nm), posted by Gabbix2 on January 14, 2005, at 18:20:58
Posted by coral on January 14, 2005, at 19:49:46
In reply to Re: moving (nm) (nm), posted by coral on January 14, 2005, at 19:48:19
Posted by coral on January 14, 2005, at 19:50:40
In reply to awesome (nm), posted by Gabbix2 on January 14, 2005, at 18:20:58
Posted by Angel Girl on January 15, 2005, at 3:55:11
In reply to Lou's resp[onse to Angel Girl's post-beachrstntose » Angel Girl, posted by Lou Pilder on January 14, 2005, at 13:43:13
> AG,
> You wrote,[...I guess ...you have to be a christian to see the significance of the word...].
> I am not a member of christiandom so I do not see the significance that you see. Can I consider that you are apologising to me by writing that?
> Lou
>
Absolutely not, I think you owe me an apology.AG
Posted by Angel Girl on January 15, 2005, at 3:56:44
In reply to Re: to Angel Girl, posted by coral on January 14, 2005, at 13:52:33
> Dear AngelGirl,
>
> No, I don't think you have to be a Christian to understand why that particular statement is so heinous. I'm sorry this has been so upsetting for you and I do fully understand why you're upset.
>
> ((((AG))))
>Thanks again Coral for your understanding and support and now he wants ME to apologize.
AG
> Coral
Posted by Angel Girl on January 15, 2005, at 3:59:09
In reply to Lou's resp[onse to Angel Girl's post-beachrstntose » Angel Girl, posted by Lou Pilder on January 14, 2005, at 13:43:13
> AG,
> You wrote,[...I guess ...you have to be a christian to see the significance of the word...].
> I am not a member of christiandom so I do not see the significance that you see. Can I consider that you are apologising to me by writing that?
> Lou
>Lou
I asked you to have that subject title removed. Simply putting an asterisk is not good enough for me. Do you honestly think that nobody knows what that word still is?
PLEASE REMOVE IT IN IT'S ENTIRITY!!!!
AG
Posted by Dr. Bob on January 15, 2005, at 4:01:44
In reply to Re: Lou you have HIGHLY OFFENDED ME!!! » Lou Pilder, posted by Angel Girl on January 14, 2005, at 13:30:46
> to put the word 'anti-christ' beside my name is totally disgusting and extremely INSENSITIVE.
>
> PLEASE THINK BEFORE YOU DO SOMETHING SO . . . UGH!!! I AM AT A LOSS OF WORDS FOR THIS.I'm sorry you felt offended, but please don't post anything that could lead others to feel accused or put down.
If you or others have questions about this or about posting policies in general, or are interested in alternative ways of expressing yourself, please see the FAQ:
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faq.html#civil
Follow-ups regarding these issues, as well as replies to the above post, should of course themselves be civil.
Thanks,
Bob
Posted by Angel Girl on January 15, 2005, at 4:06:39
In reply to Re: Lou's resp[onse to Angel Girl's post-beachrstntose » Lou Pilder, posted by NikkiT2 on January 14, 2005, at 14:45:24
> Lou., I'm not a Christian but I can see why someone who is would be very very upset by having that word next to their name.
>
> Maybe you could try thinking of it in the terms of using a word that you may fund offensive, being a Jew, but that someone who wasn't a Jew wouldn't find offensive.
>
> I did, in the original version of this, include an example, but I have removed that as I thougt you would probably be offended, but if you would like me to do so, just say.
>
> Nikki
NikkiThank you for your support. Even if Lou does not understand how he has incredibly offended me, I have made that abundantly clear and have asked him to remove the word. Instead there is an asterisk to replace the first letter. Is that to lead others to not know what that word is? I think NOT!!! I can't tell you how much I am hurt. I went to sleep and when I woke up, this is the very first thought that came to my mind. I do not understand why Lou will not comply with my wishes. He gets very upset when he feels he is being offended, can he not understand when it happens to someone else. I feel he does not understand the level of my being upset although the use of capitals in my replies and the words I have used should've been sufficient. I have been in tears over this. If he wants others to understand his feelings of being offended, well, he must also understand others feelings also and when he continued with the suject of the thread, that upset and angered me all the more. I can not believe the level of insensitivity that has been shown towards me and yet he still doesn't 'get it'.
AG
Posted by Angel Girl on January 15, 2005, at 4:09:51
In reply to Re: Lou's Shorthand, posted by TofuEmmy on January 14, 2005, at 15:31:41
> Lou - I noticed that you used "beachrstntose" as shorthand. That has 13 letters. "antichristian" also has 13 letters so it could have easly been used instead of "antichrist". It fits right into your standards. I agree with those who say you owe an apology. I'm sure it was not intentional, but you obviously hit upon a sensitive issue.
>
> emmy
emmyThank you for your support but putting the word anti-Christian beside my name would also have upset me because it could have been interpretted that *I* was anti-Christian instead of my feelings of the Faith board. I don't know what he could-ve used, maybe in this case NOTHING would-ve been better.
AG
Posted by Angel Girl on January 15, 2005, at 4:11:43
In reply to Lou's reply to TofuEmmy-sur~intent » TofuEmmy, posted by Lou Pilder on January 14, 2005, at 17:01:05
> TofuEmmy,
> You wrote,[...I'm sure it was not intentional...].
> That is correct. I do apologise for what has happened as a result of my shorthand. I will rephrase the line to:
> [...Lou's ressponse to Angel Girl antichristian?...]
> Lou
LouAbsolutely NOT. Read my last reply. Find something else and PLEASE be sensitive.
AG
Posted by Angel Girl on January 15, 2005, at 4:16:30
In reply to subject line woes » Angel Girl, posted by gardenergirl on January 14, 2005, at 17:36:33
> >
> > PLEASE E-MAIL DR BOB AND HAVE IT REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. I DO NOT WANT TO SEE IT AGAIN!!!
> >
> > AG
>
> AG,
> I'm sorry you have been upset here on Babble. I had a similar experience with a subject line with my name in it and something I found offensive. I just wanted to point out that you could also email Dr. Bob and make the request yourself to have the word XXXd out.
>
> Although I have to admit, in my case, the subject line stayed, and I had to look at it until the board archived. Fortunately, many people chipped in and posted a great deal to make the board archive faster. I don't know if that's still an option, but either or both are worth a try.
>
> Take care,
> gg
>gg
I'm sorry that you found yourself in the same position. I did not occur to me until now that I also could e-mail Dr Bob and intend to do so. I am still unhappy with the way the subject line has been ammended.
I would also not be happy to see the subject remain and wait for the board to archive as people do look at the archives.
Thank you for your support.
AG
Posted by Dr. Bob on January 15, 2005, at 4:42:39
In reply to Re: Lou's resp[onse to Angel Girl's post-beachrstntose » NikkiT2, posted by Angel Girl on January 15, 2005, at 4:06:39
> I can not believe the level of insensitivity that has been shown towards me and yet he still doesn't 'get it'.
Please don't post anything that could lead others to feel accused or put down. I've asked you to be civil before, so now I'm going to block you from posting for a week.
If you or others have questions about this or about posting policies in general, or are interested in alternative ways of expressing yourself, please see the FAQ:
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faq.html#civil
Follow-ups regarding these issues, as well as replies to the above post, should of course themselves be civil.
Thanks,
Bob
Go forward in thread:
Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.